User talk:Evosoho/Archive 1

Moving pages
Hi! When you move pages that have a move discussion going on on the talk page, please remember to close the discussion when you make the move. This is done by removing the movereq tag from the appropriate section (usually Requested move or similar). Otherwise the page will still be listed at Requested moves, even though it's already been moved. You can also use {{subst:RM top}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} to mark the section as closed (see the documentation for details). Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 11:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Sandal move(s)
The RM that you're starting on Talk:Sandal (footwear) is exactly the same RM that we just did... half of it, at least. — V = I * R  (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to re-list it to get more attention, and to get the description correct because I already ,moved sandal to sandal (disambiguation). Are you an administrator? If so can delete the redirect that has the title "Sandal"? --3^0$0%0 22:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

IAC/InterActiveCorp split
I have proposed splitting IAC/InterActiveCorp at Talk:IAC/InterActiveCorp. Please comment there not here. --3^0$0%0 16:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

IAC/InterActiveCorp split needs more input
Can someone contribute (who is not me) to the Requested split section on Talk:IAC/InterActiveCorp?


 * Actually, that huge list of links is not appropriate in an article at all; a) External links should only be used as either references, or b) in a very limited sense in an 'external links' section, per the external links policy.


 * Wikipedia is not a directory, hence I have removed the links; sorry about that.   Chzz  ►  19:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I was looking for it to be moved to my userspace for the reason that i want to improve it. Maybe it should be moved to User:Evosoho/IAC/old? --3^0$0%0 20:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

IAC/InterActiveCorp move to my userspace as an archive
Can an admin comment on the move discussion at Talk:IAC/InterActiveCorp from IAC/InterActiveCorp to User:Evosoho/IAC/old? I will close the discussion based on that admin's call. If you can merge the edit histories of User:Evosoho/IAC and IAC/InterActiveCorp so that IAC/InterActiveCorp can just be deleted. --3^0$0%0 20:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * An admin and another user have responded at the article talk. -Optigan13 (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of List of Bulgarian military aircraft
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 15:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Memorex NPOV Tag
If you are going to put a NPOV tag on a page you owe it to the rest of the authors to state what u see as not neutral. In the absence of a discussion the tag will be removed. Tom94022 (talk) 16:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete tags
Just a reminder - three applications of a speedy deletion tag on an article, or in this case, a redirect, within two hours can be hours considered abusing it. I've now removed it twice; User:Killiondude has also removed it. It would be much more prudent to let the RfD to play out (also, I've left a suggestion regarding this with your tag team partner on this - stating that putting this in context would be a much better option. Without any mention of the history of Fiat in North America - and its problems that resulted in its withdrawing from this side of the Atlantic for two decades - the target article violates WP:NPOV. Expanding the section and putting it in historical context would be a far better action than repeated applications of speedy delete tags. B.Wind (talk) 18:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Take this as your final warning. Do not add the speedy deletion tag again. You're engaging in an edit war, and you've probably violated the WP:3RR, both of which are blockable offenses. Killiondude (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)