User talk:Evosoho/Archive 3

Ewa-Kamińska Eichler
Ewa Kamińska-Eichler is a notable article. She competed at the Summer Olympics and it does meet the notability standard in Wikipedia. See WP:BIO or WP:ATH for more information. Chris (talk) 22:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I put your deletion back on. Please let an administrator do that, not you as the nominator. Chris (talk) 22:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Stop
I've watched your actions since yesterday, and you're engaging in disruptive editing. You're nominating lots of articles for AFD very soon after they're created, and moving comments left on your talk pages around by archiving/blanking/etc (in other words, trying to hide things). Please familiarize yourself with WP:N before nominated anything further for deletion. Killiondude (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Your signature
Please review confusing usernames, which also applies to signatures. Gigs (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. "3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 18:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)" is too confusing, especially when used to welcome someone.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion was also raised in previous archived threads. Please consider changing. Ottawa4ever (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Narayanacharya
Hello Evosoho, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Narayanacharya has been removed. It was removed by 117.192.162.253 with the following edit summary ' (Removed "Unknown.." element. Links have been given where he has been referrenced in Wikipedia. Included links in other pages too) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with 117.192.162.253 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

 * From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
 * News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Exploding tree
You tagged Exploding tree as a hoax on September 15, 2009. Although I disagree that it's a hoax, I think that it's full of original research. I have nominated this article for deletion; if you would like to participate in the debate, please comment at Articles for deletion/Exploding tree. Cunard (talk) 05:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BADSITE
A tag has been placed on BADSITE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nathan  T 21:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

CSD nomination of User:Fui in terra aliena declined
This was a bad tagging. There is almost never cause to speedy delete a user page that is not an attack, copyvio, or blatant advertising. User pages are not held to the same standard as articles, and in fact don't believe most admins would delete a user page even if it were patent nonsense. This users name is a Latin phrase, and material not in English does not qualify as nonsense. Frankly, I don't understand why you would have tagged it even if you did believe it was nonsense, it's just a user page after all, not an article. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This user's talk page (including history) shows that he/she is very deletion happy. Joe Chill (talk) 23:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

List of major empires
Hi. What's with the WP:Vandalism Tag? I'm just curious. --Ludvikus (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of User:Google box
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 22:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to Camponotus saundersi
Hi

Just wondering why you removed most of the text from this article, including its two references. pablo hablo. 20:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:Exploding organisms
Template:Exploding organisms, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Exploding organisms and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:Exploding organisms during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 20:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You need to put that at WP:TFD, not WP:MFD. → ROUX   ₪  20:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Exploding organisms
Template:Exploding organisms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 20:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Since you are the only editor, you can delete this yourself, with you don't need to put it up for deletion. Ikip (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Camponotus_saundersi
Would you consider changing your opinion on this article being deleted?

To give you an idea of how almost everyone feels about this article, a group of us, editors who actually fight like cats and dogs on other pages are working together to source this article.

The article is has evolved a lot since you nominated it, and it will continue to evolve today. Please consider striking your nomination and either keeping or merging the article. Ikip (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Articles for deletion/Exploding animal (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Exploding animal (2nd nomination), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding animal (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Articles for deletion/Exploding animal (2nd nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 21:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: your speedy on AllMyNotes_Organizer
Hi, I wanted to let you know that I removed your speedy tag because they don't apply to software packages. That's why the article is in AFD. ArcAngel (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

MfD archival
For future reference, MFDs are archived by the date they are created, not when they are closed. (I did not create this rule; it is longstanding for some reason). @harej 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)