User talk:Eweinber

The article Underearners Anonymous has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Now in your userspace at User:Eweinber/Underearners Anonymous - please add the sources there before moving back to article space. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 03:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, your revisions to the UA article seem ready to go back to mainspace. There are more recent references from Harper, USA Today, and another WSJ article... thanks, Petersam (talk) 05:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)