User talk:Ewing Irrigation

Hello. Concerning your contribution,, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. &mdash; User:ACupOfCoffee@ 23:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I've downgraded the copyright notice from speedy delete to a regular copyright problem. Please follow the directions at WP:CP and, if the article is restored, fix it to be encyclopedic.  Thanks.  —Wknight94 (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Ewing Irrigation
I've nominated the article Ewing Irrigation for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Ewing Irrigation satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ewing Irrigation. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Ewing Irrigation during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)