User talk:Exactly2009


 * }

Edits to Domestic violence article
Hello Exactly, I see that you made some edits to the Domestic violence article. While I don't disagree with the points you're making, the verbiage needs to be in synch with the article. The original verbiage was written with "mother" (victim) and "his" (abuser), so I'm guessing that the original contributor of this information wouldn't have changed a general statement to one that was specific to violence against women.

Two questions:
 * Do you know if the article is written about abuse in the home against both spouses (I cannot access the file)?
 * If not, the next step is to find a source (and I'm sure that there must be one out there), that discusses the effect of domestic violence against a parent (either mother or father).

For the moment, I'm going to add a "citation needed" template to the changed verbiage.

I'm happy to help out if you'd like. Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I saw the recent edit to the domestic violence article, so I thought I'd run a quick search and see what came up. Here's an article that mentions violence against the "parent", it's a governmental agency site - so I cannot see how there'd be a problem with the source.  You may want to take a look at the article to see what you think.  Since it's a U.S. governmental agency, I'm going to use it for the Domestic violence in the United States article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Edits to Duluth model
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Duluth model appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 23:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Rottweiler
Hello, what's up with this edit? You made some [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rottweiler&diff=509209806&oldid=508601875 reasonable edits to the article] and then added some nonsense in the first edit that I linked. Please make sure that your account is under your control at all times. Graham 87 14:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Don't know where the nonsense came from. I think I had better change my password. Please note that I am an expert on this Breed.

Re: Rottweiler
I didn't add that tag; it was [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rottweiler&diff=520190733&oldid=520190448 added by Cameron Scott]. Go talk to him about it. I don't think that people who are heavily invested in articles are the best people to make those sorts of judgements about their own work. By the way, I moved your comment from User talk:Graham87/Import. Comments should go on a user's main talk page, and please sign them with four tildes like this: "~". Graham 87 15:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Rottweiler
Hi, I'm surprised you have marked my edit as 'vandalism' when you have reverted it. If you check you will find I un-did the addition of the words 'who cares' which had been inserted in place of the wording about the tail being traditionally docked - hence my edit summary 'revert silliness'. Please try to take care as to what you mark as vandalism. Thank you. SagaciousPhil  -  Chat  13:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Pigeon racing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pigeon racing, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:01, 14 October 2018 (UTC)