User talk:Exasperated Bees

Hello Exasperated Bees,

Posted this comment to a recent edit of yours. Hope it is constructive...

regarding this change: "contribs) (Removing (mostly-empty) lists of works that do and don't fit pass the Bechdel test, which would between them theoretically include all works ever.)" I don't want to immediately revert a change, but please reconsider...  I disagree with removing the list of works that "do" pass the Blechdel test, and somewhat disagree with removing the "don't pass" list. Reasons: 1. The lists can be relabeled as "Example works" that pass /don't pass the test. 2. The concept is much easier to understand with examples. 3. Over time, the "pass" list would be populated.  Ditto for the sample don't pass list.   I will concede this point:     Although a big nearly-empty "pass" list is itself a pretty funny statement, and even makes a good in-comic reference with Alien, incisive comedy via article-formatting is likely wrong for Wikipedia.

Cheers. Bazzers --Bazzers 00:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)