User talk:Excelforo

July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Barnsley fern has been reverted. Your edit here to Barnsley fern was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://excelforo.blogspot.com/2018/07/Fractales-Helecho-Bransley-Excel.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 10:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alexf (talk), I appreciate your message regarding the inappropriateness of my external link. Of course I had already read the policy on external links carefully, and I have included trying to follow the instructions as best I have known. Although, I can not agree with its elimination. Let me to transcribe some points that may have led to confusion: ''What should not be linked 1-Wikipedia does not allow links that are added for commercial purposes or to advertise products, services or any kind of websites. The inclusion of links to personal pages is strongly discouraged. The massive inclusion of links to any website is also discouraged, and such action must be reported in the Café or other page to that effect and be approved by the community before continuing. The persistent inclusion of links to the personal page of a wikipedist is considered vandalism and may result in penalties. See also external link spam. 7-Links to self-published web sites, personal sites, personal web pages, open wikis, blogs, discussion forums, among others, are not acceptable, except those produced by persons or entities of recognized authority in the subject, those whose content is based on accredited sources or those that are cited to verify information about themselves.''

My intention is, in all cases, to provide an applied example of the main theme (Wikipedia) where it was included, from an Excel use perspective ... trying to make it something new and to contribute another point of view. There is no commercial purpose, since the blog sells nothing, neither announces ... and in any case, taking me to the previous point 7 (produced by people or entities of recognized authority in the subject), to indicate that for five years I have been awarded a prize by Microsoft as MVP, award that recognizes precisely my knowledge in the subject (Excel) ... award that we only have 85 people in the world.... is that enough to be 'recognized authority'???

I would beg you, if you deem it so, revert SPAM's condition of the publications that you make and to be unblock. Best regards P.s: sorry for bad traslations... Excelforo (talk) 09:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Excelforo