User talk:Excellentman9999

December 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Rob Ianello, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

=

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596448883 your edit] to Religious views of Adolf Hitler may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Adolf Hitler was a 'private, secretive individual'(Kershaw), who was also known for tailoring his
 * und den Wahnbildern der Thulegesellschaft wiederbegegente, längst gelößt und in >>Mein Kampf < seine beißende Verachtung für jenen völkischen Romantizismus formuliert, den seine eigene

Florida
To be honest, it seems to me that most of the entire article reads with a personal opinion bias. All I did was add a greater than sign to complete someone else's html error, creating a new paragraph. Then, I noticed there should be line breaks, so I went back and added those.

A single subject rule is a law that says (for example) you can't write a law for agriculture that contains a provision to give yourself a pay raise. The law must have a single identifiable subject, not multiple. You can't legally "piggyback" one law by writing it into another because you know the one you really want won't pass on its own, but the other one will. You might hope that other politicians voting on the law wouldn't read all of it and pass your law inadvertently.

I can try to explain what I understand of the section, and the article in general, but I'm not an expert on Florida laws, much less Florida sex offender laws. Any editing I did may make things worse because I might not have it right from reading this article, either.

If the article describes the color black and since I know what black is, I rewrite the article, but they were really trying to explain red, what good did I do?

I'll do this, though:

I'll see if there is a page on single subjects and link that and I will notate the section for review by someone more experienced in the subject.

George3569 (talk) 18:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)George3569