User talk:Exclaim

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear Exclaim,

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community Portal
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How to edit a page
 * How to revert to a previous version of a page
 * Tutorial
 * Copyrights
 * Shortcuts

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes. The software that runs Wikipedia will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.

I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself on your userpage.

--PEAR 18:41, August 2006 (UTC)

Albums
Hello, I've noticed in your contribution history that you have created many articles on music albums, I thought I'd like to draw your attention to the albums wikiproject, I hope you find it interesting.--Janarius 11:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, thankyou - I will certainly try to adopt some of the formatting guidelines as I add new material, and there some of my previous contributions which I will revisit in the light of albums wikiproject.--Exclaim 16:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Camembert electrique.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Camembert electrique.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have added a fair use rationale, either that will suffice or the image will disappear - one way or the other I will have learnt something!

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Douar nevez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Douar nevez.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Carnival in babylon.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Carnival in babylon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:American stonehenge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:American stonehenge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Ryder
A tag has been placed on Anna Ryder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * There were credible claims of significance, so no need to worry about speedy deletion. Regards, decltype (talk) 22:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

You say es-tar-tay, I say es-taw-tay
Hi Exclaim,

My objection to the pronunciation guide is the use of the peculiarly British/Commonwealth orthography "-tar-" for the syllable "-ta-" in the Italian word. The American pronunciation of "tar" ends with the same consonant sound that starts "run", as opposed to the British pronunciation which ends with the vowel sound that starts "awe".

The British and American pronunciations of "tar" are distinctly different, and "es-tar-tay" pronounced according to American orthography will always have an "r" sound in the middle which the Italian word "estate" does not have. I'm not saying that objectively the American is correct and the British is wrong (though as a speaker of American the British one irritates me, thus my initial smart-aleck summary), but insofar as they conflict, neither should be preferred over the other, and I don't think it's worthwhile to indicate "'es-tar-tay' in British, 'es-taw-tay" in American."

If you really think a pronunciation guide is needed (I don't), I suggest the use of IPA (estɑːtɛ) which is standard for all pronunciation on Wikipedia, and is designed to address just this sort of language and dialect-specific ambiguity. -- Paul Richter (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Ryder


The article Anna Ryder has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gone with the Bin


The article Gone with the Bin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable compilation album

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of John Richards (songwriter) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Richards (songwriter)  is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Richards (songwriter)  until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Historic Coventry edit-a-thon at Herbert Art Gallery and Museum, Coventry
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of GLAM/HAGAM at 20:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Paper Girl


A tag has been placed on Paper Girl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheGGoose (talk) 15:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Raindance (Gryphon album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raindance (Gryphon album), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Raindance (Gryphon album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)