User talk:Exenon

Cygwin comment
You wrote "software already encloses(and forces) being open source so it is unnecessary to say both: free and open source software" which isn't true. There is much free software which is not open source. Microsoft has free software for displaying copies of Office documents, but the source code is not available. Apple offers iTunes for free, but it's very proprietary. There are many other examples, but those are two that come to mind. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)