User talk:Exgovtanalyst

OSIR
Hello Exgovtanalyst,

I really don't want to get into an edit war with you about the OSIR article but I'm really not happy with the article as it stands. I was hoping we could work something out together?

My main problem is that I can find no reliable references that actually state that the OSIR exists. (I think that we can both agree that the "Illuminati news etc.." is not 100% reliable) Most of the sites on the web (like Osir.info) seem to take practically all of their information from Aykroyd's the PSI factor and what isn't from that could easily be fabricated.

You claim that the California Police Dept has confirmed the OSIR's existence, are there any reliable references online or elsewhere that mention this fact? The trouble is that on wikipedia if we make claims like that we have to prove them...

Perhaps we could create a new section called "Proof of Existance" (or something along those lines) which would include all the (unreferenced) news TV network claims that are currently in the "Criticism" section and then discuss any doubts over the OSIR's existence in the Critcism section. Could we then keep the rest of the article outside of those sections completely NPOV? and have a small diclaimer in the intro saying: "The existence of the OSIR is currently disputed, please see the 'Proof of Existence' and 'Criticism' sections for further detail"

The wording of the article is definitely biased, so it needs to be changed, for example "Any conspiracies that might arise stem solely from those who continue to question the existence of the organization in light of the hard facts of its existence." is way too confrontational for an encyclopedia article.

Please leave comments when you make edits to pages using the "editing" page itself or the "discussion" page on the article, it makes it much easier for other contributors to see why you are making the edits and what you object to about the current version.

Please could you respond on my Talk Page? (just click my name below and then go to the talk page, thanks!)

Jack-McLangley 11:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)