User talk:Exobiologist

This is the discussion page for exobiologist. Please post any messages for me here and I will attempt to respond to them as quickly as I'm able. Thankyou. Exobiologist (talk) 03:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Universe Today. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VQuakr (talk) 03:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Blame quacker or whatever it calls itself. He is the one continuously reverting material. I am merely fixing his vandalism. Exobiologist (talk) 04:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Universe Today.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  04:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

You are patrolling the page for its owner. It is blatant spam and you are doing wikipedia a disservice by protecting it. I have called upon the arbitration commitee to deal with this. As a regular contributor to the page you are obviously biased and should be ashamed of your actions. Exobiologist (talk) 04:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Calabe1992 (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Why is he allowed to make continuous reverts and I'm not? This is ridiculously unfair.Exobiologist (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Exobiologist. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion,  because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. DMacks (talk) 04:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Please help me put in a formal request meeting your standards. I'm new here but this page is an obvious attempt to draw visitors by one or more site owners. Exobiologist (talk) 04:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * If you would like for an article to be deleted, WP:AFD is the process. The page does not meet any of the intentionally narrow/specifically-limited cases for speedy-deletion. Beyond that, the talk-page definitely is not speedy-deletable as long as the article itself exists (the whole point of a talk-page is to be a record of discussions about the article content). Note I'm not passing judgment on the validity of your concerns, just that the process requires more editors' eyes and discussion than "one editor thinks it's bad, then insta-delete" for this one. DMacks (talk) 04:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Courcelles 04:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

What disgustingly obvious bias. They reverted more than I did. Enjoy your Cabal. Exobiologist (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Checkuser has you pretty much dead-to-rights here. You're not going to be able to beat what amounts to a bloody fingerprint on a murder weapon. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Checkuser is wrong. This is a public library. If you don't know what a public library is then look it up in wikipedia. This place is full of computers. What fingerprint? What murder weapon? Talking gibberish doesn't make you right. All I did was nominate Universe Today for deletion. It is now nominated for deletion by someone else. Did he get banned? No. Exobiologist (talk) 00:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

The block was for 24 hours from the 8th August. Read above. That time has expired. Exobiologist (talk) 00:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you are banned indefinitely because you have created another account to abusively pursue a single purpose. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * E-mail is now revoked due to legal threats.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  01:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)