User talk:Exotomic

Exotomic, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Ways to improve Topp Dogg
Hi, I'm Versace1608. Exotomic, thanks for creating Topp Dogg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Reliable third party references need to be added to this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. versace1608 (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Topp Dogg


The article Topp Dogg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  STATic  message me!  23:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Topp Dogg ‎, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  18:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Topp Dogg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  19:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Topp Dogg. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  19:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)