User talk:Expertful

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luise Mendelsohn (February 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luise Mendelsohn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luise Mendelsohn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Luise_Mendelsohn Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Luise_Mendelsohn reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Frank Corley
Hello, Expertful,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Frank Corley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Frank Corley.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Dom from Paris (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

You've got me interested, Expertful. Ed Ruscha's book is indeed celebrated (and I'm mildly surprised that it doesn't yet have its own article). Maybe Corley's work will be mined for more or less artistic purposes, rather as that of Joseph Selle has been for In This Dark Wood by Elisabeth Tonnard. And as you say, it's very likely to have documentary value. The problem is, arguments such as this have little or no value in the context of an AfD discussion. So far as the issue is "Is the subject of this article notable?", notability is primarily defined in a very odd way: being written up in reliable sources. (And thus Kim Kardashian scores higher for "notability" than does any photographer I can think of.) -- Hoary (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Luise Mendelsohn


Hello, Expertful. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luise Mendelsohn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Washington Monument Syndrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Zoo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western Australia Government Architect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebecca Moore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Rebecca Moore (architect) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rebecca Moore (architect), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rebecca Moore (architect)
Hello, Expertful. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rebecca Moore (architect), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rebecca Moore (architect)


Hello, Expertful. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rebecca Moore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)