User talk:Expertseo

Speedy deletion of Viscus infotech
A tag has been placed on Viscus infotech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 11:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Logan | Talk 21:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

January 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Indian National Congress, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The  Aven gers  11:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Request for Unblock
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  01:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Since a checkuser just confirmed this case yesterday, I think that her input would be good here. Although I gave the block, I currently consider it as carrying the weight of a CU block. If she wants to reblock to get that into the log, it is fine by me.
 * While I don't really care to modify the block at this minute, I don't find it convincing that this appeal mentions nothing about Isnowden (who is fully confirmed) and Rahulkhare (who is highly likely and i'd be more likely to support the 2nd person theory on). The single IP used is definitely static and has been used since September by Katyaan. So...I'm not convinced we have the full story and it makes me question the validity of the one presented. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hang on! Katyaan is another person but an acquaintance. Rahulkhare is a person from the same company I am in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rahulkhare#December_2015. As far as User:Isnowden is concerned, I am really not aware of who he or she is. The IP is static because probably we are using the same public network connection located in the same city. I believe since we haven't done any vandalism (although broken the policy unknowingly), a second chance should be given.Expertseo (talk) 08:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay. I went through https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Expertseo page and would like to state that only User:Katyaan is known to me and not others. And, the known user is a different one and not my own account. I have attracted the block because I was unaware of the policy that I stated above. It would be great if you guys can consider unblocking us. Expertseo (talk) 06:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I would also note that "Expertseo" may well be a violation of the username policy, as it very heavily implies "Expert search engine optimization". - The Bushranger One ping only 18:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And that's why I once tried to change the user name but couldn't.Expertseo (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am the one who started SPI against this user. Anyway Expertseo, can you tell who is ? Is he another employee from your company? How come all of employees of your company are interested in same topics? How come all of you support same political stand? Does your software company recruits people who supports one specific political stand? -- Human 3015   TALK   15:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Human3015, now you are on the wrong track. I am not aware of this user Girish534. And even if there is someone who is editing so am I responsible for it? Since now you have alleged, I would like you to prove to the community that I am related to Girish534. Moreover, when I say "company", then it doesn't mean that we are doing it professionally. Of course, when I find something new, it is discussed among the peer group and people take it up if they like. It would be better if you don't digress from the topic. And what political stand are you talking about? I have less than 100 edits. Expertseo (talk) 05:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)