User talk:Explicition

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Explicition! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Skarmory  (talk •   contribs)  17:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you Skarmory, happy to be here :)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Fyrael. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jason Seiken without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 05:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Such-change47. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Stewart Moskowitz have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Such-change47 (talk) 03:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC) Hi, please tell me how my edits were unconstructive? I made some little changes to make the text more encyclopedic and take out redundancies. Not any type of vandalism or unconstructive edits. Explicition (talk) 03:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Explicition (talk), me again. I just reverted once more. It is not that your edits are vandalism, but they are unconstructive because they are not improving the article. I can see what you are trying to do and I genuinely thank you for trying to improve Wikipedia. It's just that these edits you are making are not all grammatically correct or complying with the manual of style. Newcomer tasks are not always the most necessary, recommend you head to the Community Portal where there are lots of articles that truly need copy editing? Thanks! Such-change47 (talk) 03:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

OK I understand. Explicition (talk) 03:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to Boy Bitten by a Lizard: you may already know about them, but you might find Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. ''As you're autoconfirmed, you should get Twinkle. It's really useful and is something that even I started off with. It helps with automation and automates the process of reverting and warning vandals. I can also introduce you to the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy which also is an excellent place to learn more about reverting vandalism.'' --  Wesoree  ( talk · contribs ) 00:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I just enabled Twinkle and am going to practice using it today :-)


 * I'll probably check out the CVUA but I don't know if I have the time to commit to something like that right now. Explicition (talk) 00:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)