User talk:ExploreWiki

Wikipedia clearly says, do not revert changes of a user page. So don't do it. I want my page clean. And yes, Bye Bye. Vandalize pages, remove quality references. You can't fix pages but you don't like them fixed either. Thank you for everything. Bye.

June 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Please do not remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked - I have reinstated it for you. Someone else will review your latest request, but I have to say the suggestion that other editors pushed you too far and made you violate copyright seems quite bizarre. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You were told you are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests while still blocked. If you do it again you will lose the ability to edit this talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hey, got it, not removing that info. But don't bring my good bye note at the bottom ExploreWiki (talk) 11:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia clearly says, do not revert changes of a user page. So don't do it. I want my page clean.
 * Moved here from top. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * See WP:BLANKING where it says...
 * "''A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes:
 * Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block."
 * Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Making Headway Foundation moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Making Headway Foundation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Jasmine Directory moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jasmine Directory, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

HK URBEX moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, HK URBEX, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:HK URBEX concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:HK URBEX, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:HK URBEX


Hello, ExploreWiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "HK URBEX".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Jasmine Directory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasmine Directory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jasmine Directory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 22:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)