User talk:Extraordinary Machine/Archive 12

RE: Mariah Carey
First of all, YES, musical artists, engineers, producers, and writers are members of the music industry. Amateur journalists and disposable column 'writers' are NOT members of the music industry therefore their opinions are non foundational and only auxillary. As well, writers from Rolling Stone magazine are not memebers of-- or affiliated with-- the music industry. Your slanted article about Mariah Carey's voice from a fluke 1992 Rolling Stone article does not justify throwing the sincerity of M. Carey's vocal performances into a sweeping catagory of unabiltiy to showcase "true emotion through song." I enclosed the opinions of a myriad of field writers from the NARAS, a Grammy-award winning artist, an inspired fan-singer, a gaming magazine writer, and pop-culture tabloid columnist, and a music publishing representative author. The bias articles enclosed, before I submitted mine, were from extraneous writers outside of the music industry. Besides, anything any yellow journalist could ever conjure is nothing to the prestige of the NARAS.

And lasty, there's nothing wrong, unofficial, or informal about citing an interview source as the person who is being quoted, the place, and the date. Maybe you are unaware that a first-hand interview is more viable than anything published or documented. Perhaps you could do some research in your free time rather than being paranoid someone might submit better, more accurate information regarding articles on wikipedia.--The Knowledge 06:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

What happened here?
Your page is messed up. Anyway, EM READ the Wiki rules. You cannot randomly change a main page's image when the TALK page SPECIFICALLY says to discuss the matter first. I own both images in question. If someone wants to debate if an image should be changed because "it looks like she's looking at her armpit", that should go for discussion and it would be shot down. End of discussion. Maddyfan 17:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Before I blow my stack
First of all... ummm, ok I see your talk page, you are officially crazy. :-P

Can you pleeeeeease keep your eyes on this guy? He added some extremely out-of-place and speculatory information to Pet Shop Boys discography and got very angry that I removed it. I don't think I was being too critical or mean, but I need an extra pair of eyes on it (if I was overstepping, please tell me). There's some lovely correspondence on our talk pages, if you're bored and want something insane to read. He seems intent on putting this info on the page and it really doesn't look right to me. Thanks in advance. - eo 22:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC) P.S. I don't know if "speculatory" is really a word.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Donnie Darko Film Poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Donnie Darko Film Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Black Hole High promotional artwork.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Black Hole High promotional artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleting my own discussion
It's my page!!!!! I thought it was to full so please get off my page...Thank you Electric Storm89 15:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I know whats on my talkpage but I just disagree. What a nice way of communicating through the historypage......I'll remember that one.


 * Haha...okay...whatever. You know I Have explained like a thousand times why I think that my versions in the pinkpage are better. But if you don't comment on that you shouldn't argue.

Best-selling albums by year (USA)
You added a merge tag on this article way back in December 2005. Since then it has been edited several hundred times, but there has been no discussion (other than my adds) since January 2006. I am going to remove the merge tag. I have done a LOT of work to fix that article, by removing all the extraneous junk, adding the 1956-1969 #1 albums, and adding  a ref to every single item on the page. I think it can now stand on its own, rather than get merged into a related topic that has issues of its own. Horologium talk - contrib 03:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You are right about the duplication, and I think it might be a good idea to merge it with Billboard Year-End, although that, like the original target, has some serious issues with accuracy. All of my cited albums have Billboard links, but the list does not track very closely to what is listed in Billboard Year-End. I'll go ahead and add the merge tags, but I will end up doing some heavy-duty editing on the Year-End page if the merge goes through. Horologium talk - contrib 20:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

?
But many articles use UKMix as a reliable source. Plus, I just moved the Let's Dance pages because it annoyed me, and I don't know how to request. And they got the name wrong. There's no Anne in her music career name. Don't bother replying. It will only make me madder unless you have a very good explanation for the UKMic thing. And I ask you DO NOT tell me anything about the Let's Dance pages. That will just make me mad. If you want, you can tell me how to request, but don't say anything about Let's Dance. Tcatron565 23:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Question
Through the tour-mail of Christina Aguilera it is known that Slow Down Baby will be the new single....but some-one has tagged the Slow Down Baby article to the Back To Basics page. How can you reverse that?

Electric Storm89 19:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Zack_Files_US_S1_DVD_cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zack_Files_US_S1_DVD_cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Joe_Elliott_in_Bringin'_on_the_Heartbreak_music_video.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Joe_Elliott_in_Bringin'_on_the_Heartbreak_music_video.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Vanessa Carlton Navbox.
Really, you didn't have to change the layout. According to Template:Navbox musical artist, they don't look like what you changed it to. They're supposed to look like what I made it look like. Besides, it's prettier this way, isn't it? I'm gonna change it back, but i'll keep your additional changes to discography etc. Thanks —  н¡ρρi   iρρ¡   08:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Love. Angel. Music. Baby.
Good to see you're back. Actually, another user took Love. Angel. Music. Baby. to FAC, and it's there right now. I haven't done too much with it recently since I wasn't planning on bringing it to FAC without a thorough lookthrough and some updating. The recently added "Impact on popular music" needs a copyedit badly and to be merged into another section, though I haven't given much thought as to the best way to organize that. I'll probably start revamping the article some once Hey Ya! is done with FAC and when I'm done working on the Lily Allen article, which I userfied so I can eventually nominate it for GA. If you get a chance to look at the article before then, that'd be really helpful. Thanks for the link too; I've seen the article, and it had some helpful content for some of the articles. ShadowHalo 18:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I almost forgot. I started an Eight Easy Steps article because it's a good song, but I couldn't find too many sources for the article.  Since you've worked with Alanis' articles, I figured you might know of some more sources with which to expand it.  ShadowHalo 22:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've got So-Called Chaos and Under Rug Swept, and I gave in and got Jagged Little Pill not too long ago. ShadowHalo 18:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Deano91
I responded to your questions about Deano91 on my talk page. --Yamla 16:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Not Too Late
You left a message on my talk page:
 * Hi. I was just wondering why you changed the format "February 10 – 2007-03-17" back to "2007-02-10 – 2007-03-17" - my rationale for my edit was that if the two dates occurred in the same year, it's redundant to mention the year for both of them. Extraordinary Machine 23:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

The reason I added the year is because otherwise the date formatting doesn't work, as can be seen in the quote above (rendered using my date formatting preferences). --PEJL 23:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It doesn't affect only ISO date formats, it affects all date formats other than the "Month Day, Year" format (i.e. all registered users who have set a date formatting preference other than that format). With a UK date setting it would be rendered as "February 10 – 17 March 2007". I dug up an old discussion about this here. (Since then the guideline for en dashes has changed to make it more explicit that the en dash in such ranges should be spaced.) --PEJL 23:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Oops, I guess I just assumed it wouldn't change the formatting of month-day dates with the UK setting since it doesn't with the ISO setting. Thanks for letting me know. --PEJL 18:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Vanessa Carlton Navbox Discussion Continued.
omg why did they revert it back?! If you see on Template:Navbox musical artist, it says Template:Navigational templates are for GENERIC templates. *sigh* Maybe I should start an edit war :S haha. The generic ones are gross and funny. Check this one out: Template:Metallica - awesome. — н¡ρρi i  ρρ¡   04:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Los 10+ Pedidos
I left a comment in the talk page of that article. Just wanna make you know that MTV Latinamerica is divided in three feeds: MTV Norte (Mexico), MTV Centro (Colombia) and MTV Sur (Argentina). MTV Norte and Sur have their own TV shows and programs, but MTV Centro doesn't, so MTV Norte (Mexico) retransmit all its TV shows as Los 10+ pedidos to MTV Centro (Colombia) which is viewed in many countries like Peru, Chile, Ecuador, Venezuela, etc. It doesn't exist a feed called MTV Perú (it was erased of spanish wikipedia), it's just a vandalism of, who created various articles violating GNU Licence and making copyvio without pay attention to the rules, so he was blocked forever. /\n|)r0|v|€d@ {Post} 07:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

User page problem
Your user page should not exist. It simply links back to your talk page. Your user page should be used for talking about yourself, NOT a cheap redirect. Therefore, I have fixed up the page for you. If this is the way you want your user page to be, please accept my apologies for editing it. Haseo9999 19:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand now, and as such, have reverted the edit I made. Haseo9999 23:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

la la la
Hey sorry for not getting back right away... congrats on the end of exams! No need for the PSB discography lookout anymore - whomever that was who was causing the issue flipped out and basically left wikipedia. If ya want, you can assist me by keeping an eye on this person, currently using two accounts (there may be more? who knows): User:Bijanse, User:World Wide Woman... I'm getting tired of cleaning up after him/her. Anyhooooooo glad you're just this kind of crrraaaaiiiiyyyzzzzeeee and not this kinda kkkrrrraaaayyyyzzzeeeeeee!!!!! see U later gator :-P  - eo 13:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

?
What r u talking about? Tcatron565 20:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I know what ur talking about now. I have a rlieable source. I forgot to post it. Tcatron565 20:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFA/ACL 2
Thanks for your support in my RfA. Thanks also for the words you said in your support rationale; I didn't know you had seen a lot of my work. Thanks for noticing my work here. :) Acalamari 22:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Funny image! :) Acalamari 17:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Pink
Why have you change everything again? God this is irritating. For a few weeks everything was fine and nobody changed alot. And suddenly you are back and make it your own. Why? Electric Storm89 13:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry
Hi i vandalized the Stranger page I wanted to say sorry, but if Hot Dance Airplay is only monitorted by seven stations why does Billboard still keep it active. It seems kind of pointless

Hilary Duff
It's not needed to put the Radio Disney songs are her page, it's very pointless. Also, why does Happy and Smile keep getting added. The songs were not used on the soundtrack for Material Girls, considering there was no soundtrack to the movie. It's pointless to have that on there. I'm in the works of redoing that page, so please don't add it back.

American Gangster
Thanks for the cited casting addition! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll see about adding it. When articles mention "female interest" like that, it usually means a female character with which a protagonist is romantically involved. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Pop music WikiProject
WikiProject Council/Proposals. In case you're interested. 17Drew 03:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No, it's nothing serious.  More like a nuisance.  17Drew 19:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Deano91
You offered this user a 2ndchance, and they have posted some proposed changes. I declined the unblock because the changes weren't great and they weren't sourced properly, but I figured I'd alert you. As the blocking admin who offered the 2nd chance, you may have a more specific idea of what you want to see. Mango juice talk 19:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Nellygood.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nellygood.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:GiveItToMe_TIM_NF_JT.jpg
I have tagged Image:GiveItToMe_TIM_NF_JT.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Potential.jpg
I have tagged Image:Potential.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Your Message
Accepted, But you could still help, by providing a rationale for them, evebn if you didn't upload them :) ShakespeareFan00 19:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Whitney Houston- I Will Always Love You.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Whitney Houston- I Will Always Love You.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the note about "Dignity" and the .tk sites. Never knew!

Names
Hello Extraordinary Machine, you seem to have a lot of experience with naming conventions and other moves. Would you mind giving input in a topic I started at Template talk: The Pussycat Dolls? I started a topic there about three months ago related to a move, but no one responded, and I thought you'd be the best person to ask about this. Thanks. Acalamari 16:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, replied back with some more information. Acalamari 17:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

James Blunt
Thank you for correcting your edits there. While there is something to be said for moving the information about awards to further down in the article, your initial edit simply removed mention of them completely. That created a more significant POV issue than having them in the first sentence. I hope you will keep that in mind when taking your crusade to other articles. Risker 16:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

who knew
hey please!

Who knew don't nedd two chart positions! because is just 1 single! no two diferent singles! Enyone know who knew's new peak is in 2007 beacause is in who knew page!

and the album titles need be small too, because u and all like pages with more information and minor exuberances.

it enters in agreement, all we edit.

Joss Stone
Hi! I see you removed the "award-winning" intro on Stone's article. I'm not complaining at all, I just wanted to know why it is considered POV. Funk Junkie 18:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I think I got it. It's just that I removed this same intro from the Janet Jackson page, but another user reverted my edit claiming that "it wasn't POV, it was a fact". What can I do about it? Funk Junkie 19:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I will. Thank you so much! You're just so helpful. I hope I'm not disturbing you, I mean, I'm still new at these things. Funk Junkie 19:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Hilary Duff discography
Hey! Thanks! Please feel free to edit the article and fix any problems or mistakes I have made. The more people that want to improve the article the better! -- Underneath-it-All 20:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your great work and for catching my mistake. :) -- Underneath-it-All 03:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Rihanna Discography
I added "singles" to the Music Of The Sun page because 'let Me" was removed from "Rihanna Discography". Let me WAS a single, even though it was only in japan. It was a hit there. It was removed from the list of singles because someone removed Japan from the list of charts. Someone also removed it's wikipedia page. They removed all evidence that "Let Me" was a single.

Checkuser case completed
Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 00:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC).

Copy/paste articles
Yes, I apologize for that mistake as I was still fairly inexperienced when I did that. I am aware of what to do now and I can assure you it will not happen again, thanks for the notice though. --Ayoleftyz 01:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Nominations
Hey hey! Can you take a look at this section? This (to me) seems way out of control and fansite-y, and I swear (unless I imagined it) there is a guideline or a policy somewhere stating that nominations should not be listed, although wins are okay. Do you know where that guideline is? I looked and can't find it; I must be blind. I don't want to remove all that junk without first having something to back me up on it. The colors are a different story, but I wasn't gonna remove that til I can clean up the whole thing. Tanx. - eo 20:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:21_Things_I_Want_in_a_Lover_music_video.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:21_Things_I_Want_in_a_Lover_music_video.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  19:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Never Again Release Dates
Hi Extraordinary Machine, and thank you for the reply. I've found the sources confirming the release dates of "Never Again" in many Sony BMG international sites, but I still need some help finding the ones for Canada and Sweden.

Also, I was wondering if you could help me find sources confirming the facts in the article Since U Been Gone. The song is one of Kelly Clarkson's most important hits and people are more likely to read the article than any other of her previous and future singles. We can split the sections so we can finish the work faster. Thank you in advance. Bull Borgnine 21:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

??????
Yes, i was bored, so i sent u a smile. XD Explode24 22:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC) (Australia time)

You cant stand that i was right
verified proff that nothing that you are is the next single. You officially made and ass out of your self, how does it feel? Parys 23:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, W/E proven wrong again. Ran your e-mouth about how i "make up" things. You were just so sure you were right, just like with extraordinary... Proven wrong, again. Do find a day job.Parys 20:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Norah Jones album
Hello! There's no source about the sales but only logic. It's known that in Japan the gold status is for sales more than 100,000. I've looked to the Back To Basics Wikipedia Page and it's right. Also in the US the double platinum is for more than 2 million copies. Not too late has just sold 1,3 m. --Chronisgr 14:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Urgent
I am asking for help. Is this source reliable? http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/discography/index.jsp?pid=239085&aid=1079194 Does this mean that Early Winter is the fourth single from Gwen Stefani's Album The Sweet Escape. Please reply soon if you can. I want to make a page for it. Thanks! Luxurious.gaurav 17:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

A Woman Like Me (Beyoncé song) to A Woman like Me (Beyoncé song)
I noticed you changed the name of the article A Woman Like Me (Beyoncé song) to A Woman like Me (Beyoncé song). You specified you did so per "naming conventions". I'm a little confused here... WP:NAME states "Do not capitalize second and subsequent words unless the title is a proper noun". "A Woman Like Me" is a proper noun - it is a song title. Shouldn't the article title be "A Woman Like Me (Beyoncé song)"? Chupper 23:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Authorization for same fair use rationale
Hi Extraordinary Machine, I was wondering if I could let me use the same fair use rationale you used for Stranger - Single. That's all, I'll appreciate it even if you don't let me, but please do! =D. Bull Borgnine 16:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! I changed it up a bit when I uploaded this image. It looks fantastic! Again, thank you so much for letting me use it. There's no way I could have made a fair use rationale like that! Bull Borgnine 17:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Lil Mama
Why did you remove the photo I added of her? As far as I can tell the manual of style says nothing about photos that would justify removing it. If you just don't like the photo that's fine, I'm just curious what's going on here.--P4k 00:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. Not a big deal.--P4k 18:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duets (Aaliyah album)
You know Aaliyah's dead right? There's no way she can produce another album. Am I missing something? >.>; -WarthogDemon 01:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It wouldn't be unheard of. Kumbia Kings did a Duetos album that mainly reworked songs by Selena after her death.  But it sounds like some Aaliyah fans just want to hear material from her and have been talking about a compilation on forums.  17Drew 01:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm confused...why the Madge lyrics? 17Drew 02:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait...this isn't the part where you clear out your talk page and leave for a month, is it? 17Drew  —The preceding  signed but undated.

Image:Donniedarkoskelcostume.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Donniedarkoskelcostume.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse@ 09:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC) Ilse@ 09:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I seek your advice...
Hi Extraordinary Machine!, Salem Wiki asked me if I could give him the higher resolution of So Small. Should I give it to him or is it against Wikipedia rules? Thank you. Bull Borgnine 20:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Black Hole High unreleased UK S1 DVD cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Black Hole High unreleased UK S1 DVD cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Vinaixa67
Hey, I see you've given Vinaixa67 a few blocks recently too. I'm almost tempted to either indefinitely block right now or take this to WP:CSN and see what consensus is about a ban. I've had a ton of problems with him in the past with uncited edits, copyright issues, and unresponsive behaviour (the fact he doesn't speak English doesn't help at all). Thoughts? Metros 23:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Starts With Goodbye
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Starts With Goodbye, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Starts With Goodbye is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Starts With Goodbye, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Brenda K. Starr I Still Believe single cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brenda K. Starr I Still Believe single cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Beatsinglecover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Beatsinglecover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Thank you for your interest in Disappearance of Madeleine McCann. As as been fully discussed on the talk page, when the title is 'description like' WP:MOS requires that the initial words are not bolded. HTH. TerriersFan 18:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

(rm personal attack by anon)
Umm...From what I understand..people are free to edit any page they choose as long as the information is correct..I deleted incorrect information you posted...If I want do it again..I will..Do not send any more messages my way...Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.115.50 (talk) 04:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem, and thanks! 17Drew 00:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Response to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Just a thank you for fixing the details of the two articles. Such gnomic activities are invaluable for keeping the article clean. The Parris item is interesting and wholly valid, but I think that he gets a bit 'holier than thou' rather often; criticising the media from which he makes a very good living but, hey, that's a different issue ... TerriersFan 00:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Dear Extraordinary Machine,

If you are gonna restrict "Who Knew" to just having 5 chart positions, you will need to change every article on wikipedia that is a song and displays chart information. Most songs do not have this restrict, and "Who Knew" will not either. I don't care what wikisongs "recommends"; your edits are the ones that aren't constructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.218.205 (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Beat of My Heart cover
Why are you removing the cover from the Beat of My Heart article??? There's no reason to do it, WP:MOS does not say anything about "excess unfree image". // John Biancato talk 23:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Mariah Carey FAR
Mariah Carey has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 18:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Re: Beat of My Heart cover
Well, the article is about a single, and it mentions the European and the Australian cd, which the cover is different from the US cover. So, I think it is important to include the second single cover. // John Biancato talk 01:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Just want to make sure that you see full criticism of Mariah Carey
Hi, I just want to make sure that you see my full criticism of the Mariah Carey page. I believe that what you saw was a version that was not yet complete. Check it out. Boab 05:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

{again :D} Beat of My Heart cover
It's important to ilustrate that in Australia and in Europe the single was released with a different cover from the American version.  :D  // Jhn*  22:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Vanessa Carlton
I did this because Template:Discography list/doc states that: "for a band article that has most or all of their albums described in a separate article, the standard shorter list should be used instead (album year, album title, studio/live/compilation qualifier) in a bulletted list or a table. All the extra information is then provided at each album's own article." — *H  ippi ippi   05:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Yes, I am fine thank you. :) You're very welcome for the barnstar; I like to let people know that the work they do here is appreciated, and I award them for their contributions. Thanks also for noticing my work too. :) Acalamari 18:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, and on an unrelated note, you may be interested in how popular the admins' T-shirt has become. Good one for thinking of that idea to begin with. :) Acalamari 18:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

That is one fine looking shirt you designed there Machine ;) Anyway, thanks for your support in my successful RfA. As I master the ways of the mop and bucket, please don't hesitate to message me for any advice or corrections. Cheers! Spellcast 00:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

P!nk editing
OMG would you just READ first what I edited. That screenshot was wrongbut in the I'm Not Dead section I edited things that HAPPEND during the periode that you didn't look on that page. Instead of reading what others edit you think that YOUR version is the best one. How arrogant. So I'm asking something too. Please READ things first before you get all angry.

Electric Storm89 13:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Pink (singer)
Hi! Thanks for removing all gossip about her sexuality. I like your version best. I just didn't dare to remove it all even though I would have loved to. ;-) --Fromgermany (talk) 11:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

IP hopper
Hello Machine. I've noticed you've been blocking some Israeli-hopping IP vandal. Perhaps a check user can be filed for a range block? Spellcast (talk) 09:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Sometimes the snow comes down in June
Can you keep an eye on Vanessa L. Williams discography pleeze? Seems User:Jeanenawhitney has a "better" wikitable for the tables and keeps reverting my cleanup. At first (in the main Vanessa L. Williams article) she tried this, this and then this. When I changed them back to standard, she created the discography article and restored her preferred version, then has reverted my cleanup a couple times after that. Don't want to get into a formatting dispute here, but I thought the whole "I'll-move-my-prettier-tables-to-an-entirely-new-article" thing was kinda sneaky. Please and thank you! - eo (talk) 12:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ramirez Knightley and Rourke in Domino.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ramirez Knightley and Rourke in Domino.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Video albums
If 'video albums' and 'music DVDs' aren't the same, so why on these articles it's used the template with the field type filled with 'video albums'??? Sorry for any english mistake :D — Jhn*  21:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Robert_Clark_as_Vaughn_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg
I have tagged Image:Robert_Clark_as_Vaughn_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:32, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hilary Duff working on Hilary Duff in the studio.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hilary Duff working on Hilary Duff in the studio.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gakkô no kaidan G Video Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gakkô no kaidan G Video Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Chart names
Hi! Thanks, Happy New Year for you too! Long time no talk. :) Well, I was considering using the Billboard charts' former names in articles about singles that entered the charts at the time they had those names, but I wasn't quite sure about the exact issue date the charts had their names changed, so I realised this would be pretty complicated. By the way, do you know the exact date? Thanks again, hope you're having a fabulous 2007 too. Funk Junkie (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think that helps. What about an artist article mentioning singles that charted before and after the name change? Should I use the former name for the single which charted before and the current name for the single which charted after? Funk Junkie (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with your opinion. And yes, I also think this could be brought up at Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Would you mind doing it? I'll be right here in case you need a hand. ;) Funk Junkie (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! I'll keep an eye on talk:Record charts so that I get know what was decided. Funk Junkie (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * One more question (unrelated to the whole chart thing): would you classify Joss Stone as rhythm and blues or contemporary R&B? Well, I'm not sure if you know what her music sounds like, just wanted someone else's opinion! Funk Junkie (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, her first two albums had a purely '60s/'70s rhythm and blues/soul sound, but her latest release mixes traditional R&B/soul with contemporary R&B, neo soul, and hip hop. Thanks a lot anyway! :D Funk Junkie (talk) 23:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Norah Jones - Not Too Late era
Sorry for this. I had totally forgotten. I saw in the same article that the album has 4 singles. I only knew for 2. Is that sure? There are no sources for that. Cya.--Chronisgr (talk) 18:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Need a neutral opinion
If you have a moment, can you take a look at Talk:Thriller 25? Myself and a few other editors seem to be going back and forth about whether this should be in its own article. So far I've place a merge tage there, and the consensus could go either way (which is fine), but it seems to be the same few people going on and on and its been about a week. There are two main conversations going, here and here. Anything you could add would be appreciated. Thanks! - eo (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Gwen Stefani
User:Blah1993blah which is IP user. 86.29.247.165, continues to vandalize Stefani's genres on articles. Can you do something?! Charmed36 (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Science_Club_and_Principal_Durst_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg
I have tagged Image:Science_Club_and_Principal_Durst_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Speak My Mind, please speak up
Seems like someone created a similar article on this: Speak My Mind (album). Please unprotect per source. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 09:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm working on the backlog at Requested moves, and it appears this move is legitimate, and only held up by the target being a protected redirect. I'd like to go ahead and unprotect and complete the move, which I'll do unless you indicate that I shouldn't within the next day or so. Thanks. -GTBacchus(talk) 05:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Ne-Yo pic
Pls revert this. PLS revert. Doesnt the tag across the pic mean it isnt fair use/free? That pic is from a scadalous cite also. Thx. Mahalo. 70.108.96.29 (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

about Everything (Alanis Morissette song)
I usually do try to cite everything I find, and I did have the source, just forgot to add it. It's there now. LoveLaced (talk) 01:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Say It Right
Ok, maybe I'll put a ref stating the Oasis song was just download (because ones relating online-only and position are hard; I found this once, but usually they complain when blogs are used as refs), and the UWC, I thought it had the peak (it has only the number of weeks it was featured). But I'll try to fill as many as you included - after all I did some cleanup to reach GA potential and fixed everything the GAC review requested. And not only in that article, but in other two. The problem is only finding the sources (as I found that "Enhanced CD", but couldn't get a "US Promotional CD"). igordebraga ≠ 01:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gypsy Woman (Hilary Duff song)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Gypsy Woman (Hilary Duff song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.

Hilary Duff
There must be some mistake...I never edited the Hilary Duff page. There must be someone else with a similar address or something. 77.107.204.75 (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Hi. Did you read the article? The quote is taken from the entry. Read it carefully. I'm returning the information, as it was sourced and relevant to the article as she specifically marvels at M.I.A.'s style on her first album in the entry. DriveDelta (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. What links Furtado's opinion of M.I.A.'s album and the recording of Loose is the timing of the entry (during Looses early recording as she mentions), the sounds present on Loose, what some reviewers have pointed out in terms of similarities, and Furtado's praise of the style and flow of M.I.A.. Seeing as she says she is "rrecording my new album...woohoo!!! It is very exciting...I am thinking and writing and recording everyday" at the beginning, it makes sense to list this artist as an inspiration. Interestingly, she mentions "looking foward to the new System of a Down record in mid may" in the entry, which is also cited as a band she listened to on the Loose article. In this context, the wording can be changed to "listened to M.I.A.'s first album" if you prefer. DriveDelta (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I read both articles and  where she mentions these other musicians listed on the Loose page and in both, she merely mentions loving them and listening to them during the early recordings. There is no "explicit stating" of influence. There is a possibility that in later articles, she has specified who "influenced" the album. The article is written "listened to several electro and rock musicians...some of whom influenced..." so I thought to include this. It really doesn't matter if that info on her love of M.I.A.'s first album during Loose's early recording stays or goes, just thought of putting it in after reading it cause it seemed relevant. If you can think of another section to include it in, go ahead or it can be removed. DriveDelta (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Suga Mama
The article is currently on AfD. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yah. I read the edit of mine and it was quite bad; the spelling and clarification, and there's the missing URL. I was in hurry that time. Anyway, I am open when it comes to my "errors" in writing. English is our second language, I presume. Yeah, really need help for now. Thanks for that. Happy to work with you guys. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the compliment. =) B'Day is really horrible now. I dont want to edit it this time; I'll let days or weeks pass so that it will somehow looks fresh for me and I'll easily spot errors. If you're not busy, kindly check please. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * By the way, "Suga Mama" was kept. See you there soon to bring it to GA. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jeffrey_Douglas_as_Professor_Z_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg
I have tagged Image:Jeffrey_Douglas_as_Professor_Z_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Under_Rug_Swept_Japanese_promo_CD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Under_Rug_Swept_Japanese_promo_CD.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Under_Rug_Swept_Japanese_promo_CD.jpg
I have tagged Image:Under_Rug_Swept_Japanese_promo_CD.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 11:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A Little More Personal (Raw) album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A Little More Personal (Raw) album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

thriller 25
Hey ,you said you wanted Thriller 25 a merged article from Thriller (album). Just wondering, have you re-considered since then, now it's out? It's just we're trying to get a consensus going on the talk page. It'd be nice for you to either contribute to debate, or state if your opinion has changed. Consider how much both the articles have changed since your last imput as they have both seen changes. Realist2 (talk) 17:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

dual image upload
hey there, I have,entirely by mistake,uploaded two images which are exactly the same. and. image 1 is in use.I request you to delete .you can find the delete list here. thanks -Amog (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Just an informal question. Do you have any idea what's up with 17Drew. He is not seen here since December 2007. I kind of feel his absence. Indianescence (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Noah_Reid_as_Marshall_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg
I have tagged Image:Noah_Reid_as_Marshall_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:In the Pink album cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:In the Pink album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Trust (single)
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 08:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Shadia_Simmons_as_Corrine_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg
I have tagged Image:Shadia_Simmons_as_Corrine_in_Black_Hole_High.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Alanis Morissette music videos and DVDs
I have nominated alanis morissette music videos and dvds for renaming to alanis morisette video albums. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Hilary Duff music videos and DVDs
I have nominated hilary duff music videos and dvds for renaming to hilary duff video albums. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Posterraisevoice.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Posterraisevoice.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 16:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:College photography class slide show in November.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:College photography class slide show in November.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:I Dream Welcome to Avalon Heights CD Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:I Dream Welcome to Avalon Heights CD Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KaDee Strickland in The Grudge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KaDee Strickland in The Grudge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

BFJA Awards
could you please add BFJA Awards in incert list in Template:Infobox Actor.--Jayanta Nath (talk) 11:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Alanis Morissette Crazy music video.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Alanis Morissette Crazy music video.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Amerie Gotta Work music video.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Amerie Gotta Work music video.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Amerie Take Control music video.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Amerie Take Control music video.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Beat of My Heart music video.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Beat of My Heart music video.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dignity tour
I have nominated Dignity tour, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dignity tour. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 21:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)   Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 21:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Fast as You Can music video.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Fast as You Can music video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Flinch music video.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Flinch music video.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Hilary Duff Fly music video.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Hilary Duff Fly music video.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

File:IBT.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IBT.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —teb728 t c 23:57, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Mariah Carey
As you have always in the past been an editor whom I have respected and valued, I would like to ask your assistance with the Mariah Carey Discography and artucles from this i.e Music Box, Butterfly, Rainbow. My issue is the use of one reference which is Undercover.au which multiple users are enforcing above what I believe are official sources. Refer to Music Box discussion page for one example. I have tried to get clarification from the RS noticeboard, but no takers. Can you advise in your opinion whether my assessment is correct. or should I just accept this source knowing very well it is garbage? Eight88 (talk) 09:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Robert Clark in The Zack Files.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Clark in The Zack Files.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:PlayWithFire.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:PlayWithFire.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Seal Crazy music video.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Seal Crazy music video.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston recording When You Believe.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston recording When You Believe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Honey.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Honey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Honey.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Honey.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of Hilary Duff (album)
I did the GA Reassessment of Hilary Duff (album). I found the article to nearly meet the GA Criteria. The main problem was several dead links. My review can be found here. I have put the article on hold for a week pending work and I am now notifying you as the primary editor of this review. If there are any questions please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Billboard Modern Rock Tracks number-one singles
I have nominated billboard modern rock tracks number-one singles for renaming to hot alternative tracks number-one singles. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Kelly Clarkson
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a large number of concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Kelly Clarkson/GA1. I have delisted the article as it will need a lot of work to bring it to GA status. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Nine Million Bicycles
The article Nine Million Bicycles, for which you seem to be primarily responsible, is undergoing a review as part of the good article sweeps project. The article does not seem to meet current requirements for a good article. It has been put on hold for a week; if these issues are addressed satisfactorily within that period the article will be kept as a GA, otherwise it will be delisted. Lampman (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Weird single cover.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Weird single cover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hilary Duff Stranger single cover.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Hilary Duff Stranger single cover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  Σ  xplicit 05:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Vanessa Carlton in A Thousand Miles music video.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Vanessa Carlton in A Thousand Miles music video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Number 1's (Mariah Carey album) GAR notice
Number 1's (Mariah Carey album) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hilary Duff Wake Up music video.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Hilary Duff Wake Up music video.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mariah Carey5 Edwards Dec 1998.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Mariah Carey5 Edwards Dec 1998.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ja Ga  talk 19:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mariah Carey15 Edwards Dec 1998.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Mariah Carey15 Edwards Dec 1998.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ja Ga  talk 19:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mariah Carey12 Edwards Dec 1998.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Mariah Carey12 Edwards Dec 1998.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ja Ga  talk 23:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel González


The article Daniel González has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. No sources given after being tagged for nearly two years (imdb is not a reliable source). Web searches produce some mentions, but no substantial coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Choice (group)
A tag has been placed on Choice (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jason Quinn (talk) 00:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Extraordinary Machine! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Edwin Hawkins -
 * 2) Daniel González -
 * 3) Nisan Stewart -
 * 4) Chico Bennett -
 * 5) Mateo Camargo -

Endless Love
Hello EM, you done an excellant job on this, circa four years ago. Take a look at this now, and see where its come. Best, --Discographer (talk) 16:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Bulliten1.jpg
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bulliten1.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. and three others in the set.  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  18:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

FAR November (film)
nominated November (film) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JJ98 (talk) 04:52, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlie Midnight for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Charlie Midnight, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charlie Midnight until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Conventions for page move
Hi, I was about to move a page then found out you'd previously done the move in the opposite direction. Is this true as it looks odd (and if so could you point me to the convention) or did you mistake the "off" for "of" which is always lower case? Best, Rambo's Revenge (talk)  15:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Valentines (EP) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valentines (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Valentines (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Calvin  • 9 9 9 22:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/ENVY Post Production
Would you mind expanding on your comment on this AFD? It potentially the winning argument but needs some expansion for the nature/context of the sourcing to be sure. Thanks Spartaz Humbug! 05:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Mariah Carey
Thanks Extraordinary Machine, but I've only edited a few of her articles. User:Petergriffin9901 expanded most of them. I have seen your work on many articles including Hilary Duff ones. Novice7 (talk) 13:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Long Way To Go


A tag has been placed on Long Way To Go requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 00:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Changes to Goodies (album)
Hi. Would you like to comment at Talk:Goodies (album)? Dan56 (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Extraordinary Machine,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

List of Characters from Strange Days At Blake Holsey High
Hi there Extraordinary Machine, I believe you created in 2006 the Wikipedia page for the List of characters from Strange Days At Blake Holsey High. I have just one question to ask about a particular character you wrote about and I would appreciate if you would contact me. Thank you for your time. Best wishes, GORT-KLAATU GORT-KLAATU (talk) 12:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Billboard Hot 100 Chart Trajectories
Where do you usually go to get chart trajectories of songs on the Billboard Hot 100? I know you made one for "Cool" by Gwen Stefani. Where does one find the data? Arjoccolenty (talk) 18:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Robert Clark in The Zack Files.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Clark in The Zack Files.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nelly Furtado Party's Just Begun (Again) single cover.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Nelly Furtado Party's Just Begun (Again) single cover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nelly Furtado Trynna Finda Way single.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Nelly Furtado Trynna Finda Way single.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:SayitfightNF.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:SayitfightNF.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it!

Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File:KaDee Strickland in Train Ride.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KaDee Strickland in Train Ride.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 01:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Clark in Veronica Mars 26-04-05.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Robert Clark in Veronica Mars 26-04-05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ironic single cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ironic single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Too Hot single cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Too Hot single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Benjamin Brand for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Brand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Benjamin Brand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 01:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amerie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lulu James, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Blake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neon Jungle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bashment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sinead Harnett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Get Him Back single cover.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Get Him Back single cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foxes (singer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry Holland, ITV and Lauren Platt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CocknBullKid, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hackney and Clapton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rankin (photographer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Enemy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Diana Vickers
 * added a link pointing to Blondie


 * Fryars
 * added a link pointing to Dazed & Confused


 * Summer Camp (band)
 * added a link pointing to Moshi Moshi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avril Lavigne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I'm with You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indiana (singer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Blake and Portishead. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Million+
Category:Million+, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 21:05, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi Extraordinary Machine, I've seen you appear in my watchlist quite a lot lately. It's great to see an old and familiar name around again. :) I hope you're well. Acalamari 13:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * We recently lost a pop music admin so I'm happy to see one return. :) I'm mostly okay; I often miss seeing the "old and familiar" names around so it's a pleasant surprise when one come back. I saw your good work on Foxes and Jess Glynne - two of my favorite artists at the moment. Acalamari 22:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CocknBullKid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramirez Knightley and Rourke in Domino.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ramirez Knightley and Rourke in Domino.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandi Thom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pete Townsend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Emotion - Flop.
Discuss it on the talk page, because there are many albums that did worse than Emotion that are not considered a flop, maybe even a success. Drake Bell's Ready Steady Go! is an example of this. He's even considered a moderately successful musician even though his highest peak was #81. Jepsen peaked at #8 in Japan selling over 70,000 copies. So, not a flop. Find a reliable source saying so. Plus, again, take it to the talk. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:48, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florrie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of A Girl like Me, a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — Llywelyn II   17:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:White Houses single cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:White Houses single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Hole High unreleased UK S1 DVD cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Black Hole High unreleased UK S1 DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phil Collins Against All Odds single cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Phil Collins Against All Odds single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A Moment Like This (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Moment Like This (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the A Moment Like This (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Featured Article review
I have nominated KaDee Strickland for a Featured article review/KaDee Strickland/archive1 as the article has not been properly updated since its promotion as a featured article back in 2005. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Aoba47 (talk) 22:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anthony Esposito


The article Anthony Esposito has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Blythwood (talk) 21:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bimbo Jones


The article Bimbo Jones has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)). Since you had some involvement with the Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bimbo Jones


The article Bimbo Jones has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  11:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bimbo Jones


The article Bimbo Jones has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  09:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> <span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular"> <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> <div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Emma Taylor-Isherwood as Josie in Black Hole High.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Emma Taylor-Isherwood as Josie in Black Hole High.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:No screenshot available.jpg


The file File:No screenshot available.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused and unlikely to be used since we don't use placeholder images in infoboxes."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)