User talk:Extraordinary Writ/Archive 7

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello , Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to ), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also. Software news: and  have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved. Suggestions:
 * There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
 * Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
 * Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
 * This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog: Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

The Signpost: 28 November 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

RfA
Well, I'm glad another user considers to be an admin. Good luck! Sarrail (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * +1. Your RfA was perhaps the easiest Support decision I've made in RfA, and thankfully it's looking good. I look forward to seeing you around as an Admin!! :) SPF121188  (talk this way) (my edits) 20:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Slightly early, but will be logging out soon - please allow me to offer some early congratulations on a very successful run. Pinging - I believe you have a baton to pass on? Cheers both,  Girth Summit  (blether)  19:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The tradition lives on! Sarrail  (talk) 19:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It appears that Isabelle is on a wikibreak until March (their last edit was to install the WikiBreak Enforcer). I do not believe we have encountered this situation before—Tamzin, any thoughts as the creator of this tradition? HouseBlastertalk 00:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

A baton for you!

 * Seconded, and bravo!  P.I. Ellsworth &thinsp;, ed.  put'r there 01:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, I remember: it was at Deletion review/Log/2022 January 7, right? That's a comment I've never regretted making. Many thanks,, for the baton and for the kind words: I look forward to working with you. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations
I know your RFA technically hasn't closed yet, but congratulations! Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:12, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Slightly early congratulations. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations from me too. I have closed your RFA as a success, well done for getting such strong support from the community. I see someone has already delivered the T shirt. When you get bored of scrabbling down the back of the sofa finding the right block message for each block, some kind person added a bit of code in my userspace that gives a very useful dropdown message. Take care and feel free to pop over if you need any advice.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  00:09, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Felicitations Please pause for a minute and savor the moment... Done? Great. The backlog at WP:RfPP is waiting. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Congrats. Wear your new t-shirt proudly.  -- Whpq (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

draft:@Properties
Hi, I re-added the CSD notice on this draft, as I know it’s against policy, but did so for a few reasons:

Equine-man (talk) 08:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The editor who removed it is new - I believe they do not understand WP:NCORP, they even left a comment to add house listings and prices…
 * I found the interaction between the two editors suspicious, but have no evidence to bring it to admin attention.
 * No worries, . I do think G11 is a bit of a stretch: although you're right that notability under NCORP is doubtful, the draft is more-or-less neutrally written and doesn't rise to the level of blatant advertising, at least for me. As for the removing editor, I don't think anything untoward is going on there (probably just a slightly overambitious newbie), but feel free to let me or another admin know if you notice anything else that's suspicious. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I’ll keep it on my watchlist, hopefully it might evolve to a meaningful article. Equine-man (talk) 08:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for...
this. I wasn't aware that public domain material didn't qualify for CSD, but I'll definitely keep that in mind moving forward! Thanks for the detailed edit summary, that helped a lot! Seems like I learn something new every day :) Thanks again and I look forward to seeing you around! SPF121188  (talk this way) (my edits) 19:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, ! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Cal Kern
Hi. I was wondering if you could RevDel and. Also, I would appreciate it if you protected the talk page as well. I already requested protection, but I think it's faster to contact an individual admin. Thanks.  Sunil Nevla Fan ✨ 01:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Done; thanks for letting me know, . I semi'd the talk page for three days, which hopefully is long enough (I don't like protecting talk pages any more than I have to), but let me or WP:RFPP know if disruption continues. (This was my very first revdel and my very first protection, so let me know if I made any mistakes...) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * From what I'm seeing, you did it perfectly! Again, thanks for your assistance with the matter.  Sunil Nevla Fan ✨ 01:42, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Congrats
Congratulations on becoming a administartior! `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 02:07, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * +1. Congratulations! Sarrail  (talk) 02:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * +2! I just saw your name in the Deletion log and realized you were an administrator now! Welcome to the corps!
 * There's couple hundred people you can ask for clarification if you ever have any questions about the work. Don't hesitate to ask. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * +3! Congratulations! (and "Oh no, I missed yet another RfA which began & ended while I was working on a project and neglecting my watchlist.) Welcome to the team within the team! – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:55, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Many thanks to all of you (in this section and the other ones) who have wished me well over the last few days—I appreciate it immensely. Special thanks go out to for doing the honors and to  and  for being the very, very best nominators I could ever hope for. And to everyone who supported my RfA, I just want to say that I couldn't be more grateful for the trust you've placed in me—and that I hope you'll let me know when I inevitably do something boneheaded. Thanks again, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Congrats, and the advice
Congrats from me too! I have no advice. Enjoy. Drmies (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from Tc16im12 (22:50, 18 December 2022)
Hello, I'd like to update the main photo for the Guerilla Toss wikipedia page. I have a photos that I have been given permission to use by the photographer and the band. Please let me know how to do this!

Thanks so much, p --Tc16im12 (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Click here to go to the Upload Wizard, which will walk you through the process of uploading the picture to our servers. During that process, you'll give the file a name. Once you're done, click "edit" on the Guerilla Toss page and replace "Guerilla Toss, full band lineup, June 2018.jpg" (the current image) with the name of your new file. This is a bit tricky to explain, so if you get stuck anywhere along the way, let me know and I'll try my best to help. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the response Tc16im12 (talk) 23:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Congrats!
I'm a little sad I missed your RFA. Best of luck Writ. MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations... and thank you
A belated well done to you on your recent successful run for the mop, I see from my watchlist that you're already getting nicely stuck into page protections and revision deletions and all sorts of other good things. I would buy you a beer to celebrate, but I have no idea whether you drink or not so I have opted for a delicious-looking kiwi smoothie instead. Thank you too for your straightforward and well-explained close at Talk:1930 FIFA World Cup final... these things have the potential to become contentious, but a good close always goes a long way to alleviating such worries! Cheers, and wishing you and yours a happy festive season &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 20:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Amakuru! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:38, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Another belated congratulations and best wishes. Glad to have had a chance to support the RFA. Donner60 (talk) 07:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

 * Thanks,, and a (slightly belated) Happy New Year to you! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

 * Thanks —hoping you had a wonderful holiday season. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Nazran conflict
Extraordinary Writ, Hello WikiEditor1234567123 — Blocked forgery of information, conducting edit wars. The author of the article is a vandal. Sockpuppet investigations/Dzurdzuketi Товболатов (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , as I said, you're welcome to start an AFD discussion about the Nazran conflict article if you'd like. As for WikiEditor1234567123, I'd suggest letting the sockpuppet investigation run its course and, if there are still conduct problems after that, starting a discussion at WP:ANI. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

A favor?
EW, once you get back, would you be able to give Macks Creek Law a read-through? I've got a governmental finance background, so that part of the MCL saga makes sense to me, but my knowledge of legal and legislative proceedings is poor, so I want to make sure I didn't mess anything up. The situation is made weirder by pretty much everyone referring to 20 years of various legislation by a single common name. Hog Farm Talk 04:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Glad to—will leave some comments on the talk page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg ComplexRational · Extraordinary Writ
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Stephen
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andrew Yong · Dbenbenn · DESiegel · GlassCobra · Joe Decker · Nancy · Pathoschild · StuffOfInterest · William Pietri · Wwwwolf · Xdamr

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Nihiltres



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Moneytrees


 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ivanvector · SilkTork

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg GeneralNotability · Moneytrees
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Guerillero · SilkTork

Guideline and policy news
 * Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.

Arbitration
 * Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee:, , , , , , ,.
 * The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
 * The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
 * Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Why, thank you, : always glad to be of assistance! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

92.234.209.96
How about revdellin' their edits? Thanks. Sarrail  (talk)  01:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Working on it. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I think I've revdelled everything that needs to be revdelled; let me know if there's anything I've missed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm looking at two more:, . Sarrail   (talk)  01:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Gone. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Good, thanks. Sarrail   (talk)  01:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from Hebin Zhang (04:07, 12 January 2023)
Hello, mentor! I have a question: How to use the translation tool to perform supplementary translations based on the existing entries when there are already corresponding language entries? --Hebin Zhang (talk) 04:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, ! To be honest, I don't know much about the translation tool: we don't use it very often on the English Wikipedia, so I'm not exactly sure how it all works. You might get a better answer if you ask at the Teahouse. Thanks, and sorry I can't be more helpful! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reply! Hebin Zhang (talk) 12:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi, Extraordinary Writ,

I realize that you posted a question to my talk page a while ago and by now it is lost in the big middle section of my talk page. I'm sorry that I didn't get to it promptly. I've found that if I don't answer queries immediately when I see them, they can linger around, unanswered. I can answer your questions here if you'd like so you don't have to go searching on my talk page for an older conversation. And feel free to email me if that is more comfortable for you.

I've been meaning to come here any way and let you know that I think you are doing a great job as a new administrator. Thank you for patrolling the CSD categories and getting a start on closing AFD discussions. I was an admin for 6 1/2 years before I decided to get involved in AFD closures last year and we really needed a few more admins involved there so thank you! There are other areas where we could use more admin help but becoming an admin is really about you finding what activities interest you which involves trying out a lot of different things. And what you work on also changes over time and there are some admins who alternate helping out on noticeboards for a couple of months with working on articles for a while and then move to page protection and blocking vandals. We could use more admin help in a lot of different areas so there is really no area where we have too many admins at work. But you are off to a great start, I think! Liz Read! Talk! 18:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to answer the redirect-talk-page question here or on your talk page—either way is fine. And thanks for the kind words: I really appreciate it. I'm sure I'll be branching out to other admin areas as the backlogs wax and wane, but for now I'm mostly focusing on the areas I mentioned in my RfA. (Honestly, I've been surprised by how low many of the backlogs are: obviously there are some areas where things pile up, but AfDs, PRODs, CSDs, etc. are all usually dealt with very quickly. It seems the shortage of new admins hasn't turned into a crisis, thankfully—at least, not yet...) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, redirect talk pages. I must have gone to WT:TWINKLE three or four times asking them to incorporate this feature into Twinkle so that when it deletes a redirect, it also deletes the redirect talk page. But no luck. I think they might be afraid of accidentally deleting User talk pages if the redirect is to a main User page. So, the main times when I worry about redirect talk pages is with all of the CSD G13s I delete (because there is often a redirect to a User sandbox) or with PRODs. There is no problem with AFDs because XFDcloser deletes them.
 * If I delete a page and I notice on the Twinkle pop-up box that redirects were deleted, I go to the accompany Talk page and search via "What links here" to see if there are any redirect talk pages. Another thing I do is that I always have a tab open to the Deletion log and sometimes I'll just do a page search (Control-F) for "Redirect" and check any redirects that pop up that were the result of a page deletion and not from being overwritten. The final tool in my arsenal is a Quarry query for orphaned talk pages. It was a query written for me by Xaosflux some months ago to find orphaned talk pages. I run it a couple of times a day. Frequently what pops up are not talk pages of redirects but IP editors who start articles on Talk pages because they don't seem to know about Draft space. If there is an actual article draft, then I move it to Draft space and then delete the Talk page. But there is often just a placeholder text and no real content. Any way, if you don't see a Submit Query button at the bottom of the query page, just fork off your own version of the query and use that one. Explicit also has their own separate Quarry query that they run but I prefer this one written by Xaosflux. It just provides you with URLs, not links, so you need to cut and paste the URLs in a tab and then look them over to see whether or not they warrant deletion. Any way, I hope these tips help. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I figured it was something like that. I looked through the archives, and it sounds like Novem Linguae made some progress last year on coding up a fix—if I remember, I'll try and ask him sometime how much more work it'd be to finish that up. In the meantime, as long as you and Explicit are running the Quarry query regularly, I guess there's nothing for me to worry about. Have you ever tried https://orphantalk.toolforge.org/ (with the "hide subpages" box checked)? I used to run it once an a while and it worked fairly well. Anyways, thanks for taking the time to answer! I'll be sure to let you know if any more questions come to mind. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Thurgood Marshall
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Re: Unusual block lengths
Because it's boring to just indef. It's also fun when you can block in fortnights. Standard 24hr blocks for me are 37. Standard indefs for me are some absurd number based on just random numbers x fortnights. Gotta put some humour into it. Mitch 32 (won't you be my neighbor?) 02:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

YGM!

 * Hello, Extraordinary Writ,
 * I actually sent this message to you over the weekend but I didn't hear back so I'm not sure if you didn't have a reply or, like me, you don't check your email very often. Any way, from now on, I'll post messages directly to your talk page and skip using the email option. Have a good week! Liz Read! Talk! 18:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I responded last night, actually. Maybe try checking your spam folder? I have an unusual email provider and (as it says in my emailnotice) some people have reported that my emails get mistakenly sent to spam. If that doesn't work, let me know and I'll try sending it again. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from 4equals1 (12:24, 21 January 2023)
Hello, I wanted to add an image of an album cover to a Wikipedia page, but I couldn't find it when I searched for it. So I decided to add it manually, but it won't allow me to. How do I get past this? --4equals1 (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! This is a bit of a tricky question because it depends on who holds the copyright for the album cover. If you hold the copyright, or if the person who does hold the copyright agrees to freely license it (meaning that the cover can be used by anyone, for any purpose, so long as attribution is provided), then you can go to this page and upload it using the instructions there. If the album cover can't be freely licensed, the image can't be uploaded except under narrow circumstances, for instance if there's a stand-alone article about the album that the image can be used in. Let me know if you think that exception applies. Apologies for the legal mumbo-jumbo, and let me know if you have any questions! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 54
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 54, November – December 2022 
 * New collections:
 * British Newspaper Archive
 * Findmypast
 * University of Michigan Press
 * ACLS
 * Duke University Press
 * 1Lib1Ref 2023
 * Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

unprofessional attitude
https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinosaurus Funny it might be but the last picture isn't the most professional. I think it makes Wikipedia look like just a troll page which allows users to upload anything without consequences, and cannot even be removed... Thank you WNacht (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , I don't speak Hungarian and have no involvement with the Hungarian Wikipedia, but if there's a problematic image over there, you're welcome to just click the "edit" button and remove it. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Note of Appreciation
Hey, I noticed that you have restored the article Saudi Vellakka. I was tagging all the articles created by the sockpuppet with G5, this was one among them. As it was a new article I didn't look further into it. Later, Liz informed me about how to use G5 properly. Thank you for reversing the deletion. Akevsharma (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem, Akevsharma! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I wanted to ask you something else. Recently, a new user created a possible UPE article in the draft space with the title Draft:Ganesh Raj and then immediately created the same article in the main space with exactly the same content. It is clear that the user knew that having an article with the same title in the draft space would prevent it from being moved back to the draft space. I have added the report to an existing SPI and is waiting for the results. However, my concern is that is there any way to prevent this kind of crooked move other than directly going for an AfD? Akevsharma (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Very tricky! The answer depends on who you ask. Some people will just move it to a different draftspace title (like Draft:Ganesh Raj (2)), but others say that since the author has basically objected to draftification, you should send it to AfD. An added benefit of going to AfD is that you can use G4 speedy deletion if the article is ever recreated later on. In your case, I'd recommend waiting for the SPI to finish to see if you can use G5; if not, just take it to AfD. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Well noted. Akevsharma (talk) 06:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Edit conflict
You closed Articles for deletion/List of Byzantine emperors while I was contemplating a !vote. I doubt it changes anything, but here is what I had written:
 * Keep per Avilich: The topic is notable and common sense suggests that there should be a page dedicated solely to this. Our current list of Roman emperors page represents a highly "legitimist" interpretation. The Latin emperors are excluded in favour of the Laskarids. The list stops in 1453 without regards for any subsequent claims. The Holy Roman Emperors, who had a stronger connection to Rome, are ignored entirely. If we are to have one list like this, I would title it List of Roman and Byzantine emperors for clarity.

—Srnec (talk) 21:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , I agree that your !vote probably wouldn't change the outcome, but I don't have a problem with re-opening the discussion if that's what you want. You're also welcome to start an RM discussion on moving the list to List of Roman and Byzantine emperors, of course. Let me know what you'd prefer. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I would like the discussion re-opened. I think this is a big change that needs more thorough discussion. Thanks, Srnec (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay,, done. I'd encourage you to add your !vote sooner rather than later since (at least in theory) another admin can reclose the discussion at any time. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Mariokart8deluxe.jpg
Hey, I forgot to change the details for the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe file earlier. It is now only being used on the page Mario Kart 8. There used to be a page for Mario Kart 8, but it was later merged with the main Mario Kart 8 page. If there are details that I missed that needs attention, I would appreciate it if you can inform me of additional info needed to keep the file. Thanks! Davidng913 (talk) 15:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yep, that's fine, . I've removed the deletion tag for you. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss
Please excuse my ignorance, but can you please explain "G6: Unambiguously created in the incorrect namespace" as the reason for deleting "The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss"? Was the article named incorrectly or does this mean that it did not have adequate notability documented? Jjhake (talk) 02:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Please disregard (or delete) my question. I thought you had deleted the article by this name, but I see now you were just deleting something that I had stupidly created in the "Wikipedia" namespace. Please excuse my pointless notes here... Jjhake (talk) 02:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

IP you blocked for block evasion
- I'd like to know more. If you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:021120x&action=history an IP not geographically far away has also been posting complaints about the same editor, and there's a second IP making the same complaint at Sideman's talk page. Doug Weller talk 09:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi . Yep, they're all from the same LTA who's been bothering Wes sideman for a while now: other IPs/accounts include, 2601:589:4100:0:0:0:0:0/48, 71.27.210.33, 172.58.158.146, and 65.246.72.91. Revert, block, and ignore. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * See Sockpuppet investigations/Defeedme. I checked but handed it over. Doug Weller  talk 18:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Question from PSudhaRajeev7 (08:40, 27 January 2023)
How much time does it usually takes for an article (Bio of a person) to appear/publish on google ? --PSudhaRajeev7 (talk) 08:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Once an article is created in mainspace (which means the title doesn't contain "Draft:", "User:", or anything like that), it will be checked by someone called a new page reviewer, who makes sure that the article meets our basic requirements. Recently this has been taking less than a month (and sometimes just hours), but it depends on how long the queue is. If the reviewer approves the article, it will usually appear on search engines within a couple of days. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. :) PSudhaRajeev7 (talk) 17:54, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Gimmetrow
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bjelleklang · Bob the Wikipedian · Leithp · WhisperToMe · 100 inactive admins



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BDD · Bradv · Donald Albury · Maxim · MusikAnimal

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BDD · Bradv · Donald Albury · Maxim

Guideline and policy news
 * Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
 * Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.

Technical news
 * The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration Miscellaneous
 * The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
 * In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
 * Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
 * Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
 * Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/George Stanford (2nd nomination)
Hi, should this discussion remain open as the previous discussion Articles for deletion/George Stanford was closed as keep by yourself about a month ago, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. Generally speaking I can't close these sorts of AfDs early unless they're either completely disruptive (WP:CSK #2) or an objection better suited for DRV (WP:PCLOSE), but you're quite right that this shouldn't have been renominated so soon. Let's try this:, for future reference, please don't renominate an article that's been recently kept at AfD (per WP:RENOM, a six-month wait is typically a good rule of thumb). If there's a serious problem with an AfD, usually it's best to ask the closer to relist it and/or go to WP:DRV instead of just renominating—otherwise, you're likely to get procedural complaints along the lines of what happened here. Thanks! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Question from Smegcott (13:20, 4 February 2023)
Hello! How are you. I had a question. I created a second sandbox (subpage) and I was wondering if there is a way to navigate to it other than just typing in the address in the URL address bar? Thank you for your help! --TheMSS (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I think the easiest way to do that would be to go to your user page (which you can access by clicking on your username in the upper right-hand corner of any page), click "edit", tap the link icon at the top of the screen that looks like this: [[File:Link button.png]], and type "User:Smegcott/sandbox2" into the search bar that comes up. This should put a link to your second sandbox on your userpage, where you'll be able to find it in the future. Let me know if that doesn't work or if you have any other questions. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Wiley Rutledge
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 18 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/March 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)