User talk:Extrauniversal lovechild

Welcome!

Hello, Extrauniversal lovechild, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Taakatism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Evaders99 (talk) 06:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Taakatism


The article Taakatism has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't seem to meet the Notability for Organizations & Companies - WP:ORG - only 3rd party source is still a direct interview, on a site that has questionable neutrality

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Evaders99 (talk) 06:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

2011 Oct
I recognise that in your most recent submission of Taakatism you had provided more (badly formatted) references. However, I am still unhappy about the notability. The Spiritual Week is probably an independent source but phrases in their article such as "have no way of knowing", "but nobody was available for an interview" and "since disproven claims" do not inspire confidence. If you can actually provide good evidence of notability, feel free to resubmit via deletion review. I can let you have a copy of your text - read this. &mdash; RHaworth 14:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)