User talk:Extreme Ryan Delena

Spruce Peak (Vermont) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Spruce Peak (Vermont), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spruce Peak (Vermont) (September 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spruce Peak (Vermont) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spruce_Peak_(Vermont) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:78.26&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Spruce_Peak_(Vermont) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 16:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Peak 3025 (Vermont) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peak 3025 (Vermont) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peak 3025 (Vermont) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 01:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

List of NH mountains
Hi Extreme Ryan, Thanks for all the additions you've been making to the List of mountains of New Hampshire. They appear to be ones which are associated with hiking trails, so they are helpful and constructive edits. Seeing as I've been making several corrections to your edits, let me pass along a few tips to ensure a high-quality end product. First, please check to make sure the mountains are shown on US topo maps. You can go to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names and click on "Search" to see whether a mountain's name is officially registered. If it isn't, as is the case with many of the mountains in the Belknap Range (e.g. Mount Mack, Mount Klem), please provide a citation to a published source, such as the trails map of the Belknap Range. Let me know if you need help with formatting references. I've removed some peaks, such as "Caribou Mountain", where no such name occurs on the BGN list in New Hampshire and I suspect it may be in a neighboring state.

A few housekeeping practices will help with the table's appearance. Please use the "sort" widget when a peak's name begins with "Mount". There are plenty of examples of its usage in the table. Also, when adding text to the right-most column (e.g. "Subpeak of Carr Mountain") there is no need to add the double vertical bars afterward, because there are no more columns in any row to the right of that entry. And finally, please double-check your arithmetic with regard to elevation unit conversions.

Thanks for all the research you're adding to the list! --Ken Gallager (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for adding the ref to Mount Shannon. Two things that would reduce the amount of fixing I need to do: 1. Please make sure the "sort" template is added to summits that begin with "Mount". 2. Don't put the links to sources such as peakery.com in double brackets. Instead, put them in single brackets, and add ref tags before and after. You can look at how it's done for any of the other mountain entries in the list. Thanks. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Sort widget issue
I tried using the “sort” feature on all my additions that start with “Mount” and that caused a problem with the table resulting in the additions to show up in regular text instead of the red text that allows you to create articles. It also shows parts of the code used in each addition, causing it too look something like this “|Mount Shannon (New Hampshire)”. I double checked to make sure there was no issue and it seemed like it was typed properly. Extreme Ryan Delena (talk) 21:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * What happened on Mount Shannon was that you inadvertently deleted the closing brackets for the sort feature when you added the citation. Anyway, I look forward to your further additions to the list. You're giving me lots of ideas for hikes! --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Spruce Peak (Vermont) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spruce Peak (Vermont), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Spruce Peak (Vermont)


Hello, Extreme Ryan Delena. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spruce Peak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  08:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)