User talk:Exxolon/Archive7

Hi Exxolon, I hope this is the right place for this. I was coming back to say thank you for supporting the removal of my name from the KORC AM entry, but saw it was back. I obviously didn't get to participate in the discussion, can you give me some feedback as to why it was put back? Thank you. kevin Mrsuperk (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Exxolon, thanks for the reply. I guess I am not sure a), why I couldn't find the darned discussion page (I just haven't found my way around this place well yet), and b)why the note that I am plainly THE person in question on the talk page to Dravecky wasn't clear. I have found the proper talk page, thank you, and again requested my name off. Whom shall I address any verification? !64.0.147.226 (talk) 23:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't logged in, It's me. Mrsuperk (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Thom Yorke
So concluding that a man who calls himslef a socialist is a socialist is original research? Sbrianhicks (talk) 00:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

if we have been written about do i just need to site it?

Re: Truce
Again, I apologize. I'm a hothead. There was no excuse for my violating, on the ANI thread, the principle of "Is it necessary, or kind? And if its not necessary, or kind, why say it?" I appreciate your olive branch, this shows wisdom.

As to the Gokkun thread, this is public political battle and I will fight it. However, it was out of line of me to call bad faith, and not only out of line but a lie, since I actually do believe that you, personally, are acting in good faith. Apologies for that, not to say that I withdraw the general thrust of my argument.

I couldn't hold grudges if I wanted to since my memory is not good enough to keep track of who is who, in most cases. Cheers, Herostratus (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Karen Flaherty
I have edited the page twice to add information about US Navy source which is in the public domain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhjohns (talk • contribs) 18:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC) The MOAA blog is, itself, a copy of the Navy's biography Mhjohns (talk) 18:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Now that it is clear that I have not committed a copyright violation, is there any chance that you could remove, revise, or retract the copyvio assertions on my talk page?Mhjohns (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for removing your notices - I really appreciate it. Mhjohns (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Criticism of Citizendiu
Unlike at the other title, I see no evidence that the creator wants to have it deleted. If I saw a reason to say that the creator wanted it to be deleted, I'd be happy to do it. By the way, if you look at Criticism of Citizendium, you'll see that I'm the one who deleted it. Nyttend (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Bob Geldof
If you want to report every family detail of every biog here, I don't think Wikipedia is the place to do it. WP:INDISCRIMINATE, unless it significantly impacts on an understanding of the subject of the article. In this case, there's no evidence of that, and it's arguably (apart from vandalism) the very worst that we should be offering to our readers (remember them?). Rodhull andemu  00:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Millane Kang
I apologize if I posted this in the wrong section, usually wiki admins have lots more going on in there talk pages. So I don't know if there's another page or something, but anyways.. About the Millane Kang article, I don't really understand why you have proposed it for deletion. She's a real person, it just so happens that there isn't much about her because she mostly works in france. I have seen other articles that were remarkably short, just like the Millane Kang article. -Hotspot

Was just going to tag Duck Day for speedy deletion as a hoax
I searched the web for "duck day", but could not find anything about it other than the article. I wrote this on the article's talk page and had been going to tag it for speedy deletion as a hoax, but I noticed that you PRODed the article instead. Should it be PRODed or CSDed? Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Broken Links on Discworld Characters overhaul
Apologies. I'll fix them. Unfortunately, this week(until after Monday the 6th) is a bit hectic for me(Final Exam week), so I won't be able to get to it until then.--Mobtown Mongrel (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Flash mob
Please read the definition from its cited source as in the case when you removed a key word from the definition of Flash mob. The Oxford English Dictionary specifically emphasizes the word 'pointless' in its definition separating it from other similar smart mobs that have advertisement or political motivations. Thank you, Mkdw talk 23:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

27 stroke B
Yinzland's comment was a barb, comparing Wikipedia to Terry Gilliam's film, Brazil. It isn't a favorable comparison, I'm beginning to think that the die is cast for this particular user. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Images added to three articles
HI: Sorry to have stepped on your toes. You added three images to three different articles. In all three cases, they were graphics that were nearly identical to images already in the article. but not as good a quality, and so they added nothing to the article that was not already there. If the images had been added to a section in the article that had no illustration, and shed that sub topic, or something new about the topic, it would add to the article. As I am not an artist, I hate to say, just my personal opinion, but the images seemed not of particularly good quality or detail either. Again, sorry. Atom (talk) 04:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Barrymore undue weight talk
Hi, was sort of cleaning up the "Death of Stuart Lubbock" section as I was reading through it, mainly links, a word here or there, rewrote a sentence or two to improve clarity, when I had finished I saw your "undue weight" banner. I must say I agree, it is rather badly written, a rambling chronology of ALL the twists and turns in this enquiry, with the BBC announcing today that the police have launched a fresh appeal for information.

As of now, there is no Stuart Lubbock article although someone called highgater suggests on the same talk page that there should be one, which would detail the ins and outs of the enquiry. What do you think? I would be happy to try my hand at a) reducing this section to the salient facts relating to Barrymore and b) creating the S. Lubbock article out of the rest (after having read up, checked the sources etc.).

This is sort of a big step, if you agree, can you give me advice or pointers? I know I will need to go and read up on some WP:stuff like copy-editing and style (I am well aware of WP:BLP by the way and agree that the Sun and so on are not very serious sources), do you have any other suggestions? Thanks. Captain Screebo (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Note
Just so that we are abundantly clear, I wish to draw your attention to this comment of mine; specifically, that if you ever remove any deletion tag from your own content, you would rapidly find yourself in deep water. When you delete this note, I will take it as proof that you have read and understood. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  Not-content  ─╢ 13:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Unlike you, I don't delete messages (aside from templates) - I have NOTHING to hide. Feel free to try and get me sanctioned if I revert you tagging one of my images for deletion, WP:BOOMERANG is the most likely result as you are already under scrutiny as per the recent WP:ANI thread about you. Exxolon (talk) 17:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I'm willing to risk it. Are you? ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  without portfolio  ─╢ 17:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Bring it. Exxolon (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Can you clarify please?
Hi - User:TreasuryTag is using this edit that you made as justification for not notifying me of a deletion (See ) - this runs counter to the instructions at WP:FFD - can you clarify please? Exxolon (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It was what I remembered at the time. Perhaps it may have changed since. Stifle (talk) 08:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)