User talk:EyEsReaDeR7

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Will Beback   talk    05:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Will Beback   talk    05:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Hosni Mubarak, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PTJoshua (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 01:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I'm sorry that you're unhappy, and I'm sorry that you didn't see the bright orange 'new messages' bar that started appearing at the top of every page after you got your first warning. I'm sorry that you didn't see the Getting started section when you joined, and I'm sorry that someone has taught you that being rude and aggressive is a good way to get what you want in the world. However, I can't fix those problems for you. I can help by advising you that your position as a university student/publicist/naval officer/White House adviser is not significant at Wikipedia. All we need you to do is explain clearly why the edits you made were unhelpful, and what you would do differently if unblocked. Take a few minutes to read some of the advice at Getting started, especially the sections on writing with a neutral point of view and discussing your edits with other users, and then respond more specifically (and more courteously) about what you'd do differently. Just because you're blocked, doesn't mean we're all out to get you. We'd love to have your help, once you know enough to be helpful. We just don't want to unblock you if you're just going to make it necessary to quickly block you from editing again, because that wastes our time and makes you feel frustrated and unhappy. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

As I recall very well, I haven't given anyone any threats at all. On the contrary, I have sworn to protect you and all American citizens around the globe. It's, however, my right to express my personal opinion, that is based on a personal experience, in any press conference as a U.S. Citizen like you and all other American citizens. Second, being A PROUD member on the best Navy in the whole world adds, positively and highly, to my personality as a student, pro-publisher, and as a human. The reason why I brought it up, is to reply to your arrogant way of replying and demanding things from people which made me obliged to explain to you why I can't, and will not, beg u to do anything. I also made it very clear that I haven't received any warning emails from your website until after the block has been applied. NONE, NOTHING, not even ONE warning email! Is this clear Sir?!?
 * I have the utmost respect for all of our armed forces, but that does not change the fact that your request is not written in a way that is likely to get you unblocked. In addition, Wikipedia does not create warning emails.  Notes are left on your talk page.  Your first warning was given 3 days before you were blocked. Ryan Vesey (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Your warnings are still here on your talk page, all time-stamped before your block. You got four warnings before you were blocked, and each time, you saw a orange banner that said 'you have new messages' telling you to check your talk page for messages.  You have not clearly explained what it was about your edits that wasn't useful in an encyclopedia, or what you would do differently if unblocked, so there's nothing in this note that I can review.  I can't even tell whether or not you've read the linked guidelines that I suggested or not.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, Thank you for your respect, it's always a refresh to see appreciation for someone's sacrifice. You, as Ryan Vesey and NOT Fisher Queen, deserves my apology and respect as well. And it's okay, since from what you just said it seems that I did something weird and I got punished for it before I even get a chance to stop doing it! So I take full responsibility for my actions and you can go ahead and ignore my unblock-request. I won't feel bad. I apologize again :).
 * The only difference between what he said and what I said is that he complimented your position in the military and I didn't, since it isn't at all relevant to the question at hand. Does this mean you don't want to be unblocked any longer?  You still haven't really discussed the question of what you would do differently if unblocked. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Mr. Queen, I believe I made myself clear in my previous requests about my future intentions towards my addition or deletion to materials on this website. And yes the only difference between Mr. Vesey and you is that he has FAR more experience in dealing with users than you do. The first unblock-request you've already declined, so I don't expect any different reaction from you no matter what I tell you. Finally, and as an advice, your unfriendly way of dealing with users will never guarantee respect nor fulfillment to your job description. I would, however, ask you to do me a favor by not talking to me again and refer any further matter to another administrator instead. Thank you :).

It's okay, I learned to check that page every once in a while, since u don't have a policy of sending warning emails before you perform any blocks on user accounts. I have a question though, is anything of what I'm going to ADD later will be always removed even if it was a supported and known fact that negates a paragraph or two of the original subject?!?
 * Well, yes, you did answer the question, but your answer was incorrect, and didn't show an understanding of the rules. That was why I asked you whether you had read the rules or not yet.  You didn't answer that question, but based on your response, you don't seem to have read the rules yet.  If you haven't read the rules yet, you should definitely take time to read them before you request unblock again; you can't follow the rules unless you know them.  I'm sorry you don't like my manners, especially since you don't seem to have understood what I was saying to you. Could you closely reread my notes and understand what I was trying to say, and then suggest a way of saying it that would have been more likely to communicate with you effectively?  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * When you're doing that, make sure to carefully read what you wrote, too. Imagine that you are a stranger, and ask yourself whether you'd like to work together with the person who wrote your messages. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Unblock Request
I understand that you may be angry about your block, but if you desire to be unblocked you need to demonstrate a cool head. An administrator will be much more likely to unblock you if your request clearly shows that you now have an understanding of Wikipedia policy. They are not likely to unblock you when your request seems like a rant. Wikipedia does allow deletions; however, when deleting an edit that is not vandalism an edit summary should be included. If the deletion is controversial in any way, it should be discussed on the talk page of the article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, Thank you for your respect, it's always a refresh to see appreciation for someone's sacrifice. You, as Ryan Vesey and NOT Fisher Queen, deserves my apology and respect as well. And it's okay, since from what you just said it seems that I did something weird and I got punished for it before I even get a chance to stop doing it! So I take full responsibility for my actions and you can go ahead and ignore my unblock-request. I won't feel bad. I apologize again :).