User talk:Eyal63ta

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

References are intended to document text, not just to decorate it
The whole point of using references is to support the referenced text with reliable sources. Your edit failed this on three separate levels. First, a blog post is not considered a reliable source, so the reference is not a useful addition. Second, the page being cited contradicts the edit being made - it says that Bari was an Arab entity, not sub-Saharan African as you claimed in your edit. Third, the article had text that was in agreement with its cited sources. By changing the text that was referenced without changing the existing citations, your edit broke the relationship between texts and sources - the old references no longer match with the new text. All of this is problematic.

The change you are pushing is clearly controversial. When making such a controversial change, it is incumbent on you to achieve consensus on the article's Talk page, not just repeatedly putting the flawed material back in in the face of opposition. See WP:BRD - editors are free to make bold changes, but when such a change is reverted, it is time to discuss the changes, not keep making them. Agricolae (talk) 21:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)