User talk:Eyalcohen13

Welcome!

Hello, Eyalcohen13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File talk:X.png, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Super Mario  Man  20:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of File talk:X.png


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Super Mario  Man  20:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Your test worked
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wonders of the World. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wonders_of_the_World&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 06:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to List of cities with defensive walls appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of cities with defensive walls. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

What Wikipedia has to work with, is the UN view on Jerusalem's status. See Positions_on_Jerusalem. As for you trying to change the status of Jerusalem here in Wikipedia articles: you are not the first, and surely will not be the last to try so. Sometimes it's changed to Israel here in Wikipedia, as you did, sometimes it's changed to Palestine. - Takeaway (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC) As for your edit summary "well, if east jerusalem isnt in israel, then timbuktu isnt in mali, its in azawad", actually quite the opposite is true. Mali is "de facto" now held by people who state that it is the capital of Azawad, which is actually similar to your, and not the United Nations', view on Jerusalem as you state [|here] in your edit summary of Wonders of the World when you write in your edit summary "De facto its in israel". - Takeaway (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mattanya Cohen


The article Mattanya Cohen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. j⚛e deckertalk 23:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality
Regarding your edit summary, "Disputed is more neutral than "occupied" as occupied hints that Israel is evil or something like that. I changed it to disputed in order to conform with the neutrality policy". You don't understand the neutrality policy. It's called WP:NPOV. Read it and comply with it. If you are unable to comply with it because of your personal views then Wikipedia isn't for you. Your edits are consistent with those of someone engaged in nationalist advocacy. Advocacy is forbidden in Wikipedia (see WP:NOTADVOCATE). If you continue this way your editing privileges will certainly be removed at some point.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 16:23, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

I will have to agree with Eyalcohen13, officially the spoken territories are disputed. Both of us do not use Wikipedia as a propaganda site, nor that we intend to, even when I believe with all of my heart that Judea and Samaria is rightfully ours.

I do realise that the claim has to be sourced, and I'm sure we can find easily a source which won't be anti-Israeli biased and will rightfully call those territories, AT LEAST "disputed".''

"Occupied territories" in Israel is like calling a guy "evil", or "idiot" on a biography article, it is highly biased and therefore conflicts the definition of unbiased encyclopedia that Wikipedia aspires to be. - אשכנזישעיידן —Preceding undated comment added 19:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)