User talk:EyeFilmNorwich

March 2019
Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Norwich, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * There have been two problems with this account. The account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy, and both your editing history and your username indicate that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. If you would like to continue to make contributions unrelated to your business, as you have done in a couple of edits, you are very welcome to do so, but you need to have an account which is for your personal use, which will not be used by anyone else, and which must not represent a business or other organisation or have a username which suggests that it does so.
 * It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)