User talk:Eyesnore/Archive 2

Burnie Burns
Why did you need to approve my edits on Burnie Burns? I'm a reviewer too..?  Frigid Ninja  20:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Matt Flynn
The change of Matt Flynn being traded to the Oakland Raiders was deleted at the moment because the trade has not officially happened yet. As the citations listed in the article (i.e. The Tweet from Albert Breer)state that some kinks are still being worked out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.169.180.96 (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Sued from the Haus of Gaga
My name is Helen Green, and i just wanted to tell you that wikipedia is going to be sued by Miss. Stefani Germanotta (aka Lady Gaga) for spreading unreliable informations. I work for the Haus Of Gaga, and Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta herself confirmed that she won over 290 awards. ✔ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gagawarhol (talk • contribs) 18:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Low nationality
Hey sorry for my english Kupono is Puerto Rican nationlity beacause he playe which Puerto Rico is like Josh Saunders he palyed only 3 games which Puerto Rican National Team and he appears Puerto Rican in Wikepia and in FIFA Games. He is Puerto Rican Sports Nationality :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.50.37.145 (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

An inquiry about the recent revert you made on my talk page
I noticed you recently reverted what appeared to be a perfectly good message on my talk page. Just out of curiosity, why did you do this? It wasn't even vandalism; it was a question about an article that was recently deleted. Please don't revert messages on my talk page unless they're clear vandalism. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

What does "clean up" mean?
I've been to at least three pages in the last day or two, all of which have immediate history of "clean up" by you, and all of which have referencing errors. Do you check pages at all?

 (talk) mytime= Mon 11:48, wikitime=  03:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Toronto
Hi, Eyesnore. You closed the debate at Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 21 as "keep", but the one user who opposed their deletion retracted their vote later in that discussion, as they reminded me on my talk page (User_talk:Arctic.gnome). Since there was no opposition to the deletion, I think you should reconsider your decision. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your reversion of changes I made to Mondelēz International
Could you explain the specific reason(s) you reverted my changes? Referring to the Manual of Style is too vague to be helpful. - Dougher (talk) 01:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Linking normal and obviously common English words are considered redundant links and makes articles harder to read.  Eye snore  (PC) 01:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Associated Press false tweet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Associated Press false tweet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Associated Press false tweet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Superm401 - Talk 03:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

65 million years ago listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 65 million years ago. Since you had some involvement with the 65 million years ago redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  Eye snore  (PC) 19:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Wiechel projection, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:55, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

unfounded coments
You have described my edit as "vandalism". This is unwarranted and inaccurate. The article has very little accurate information. It is a disgrace to have such a slanderous and highly biased article in Wikipedia. If you have bothered to search and read its sources of information almost all have a conflict of interest or are simply malicious. Reliance on truth and unbiased encyclopedias is a standard set long before Wikipedia came into being and should be its goal as well. I request the ability to write an accurate and unbiased article on this subject which I have considerable information and reliable reference sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billgreenjeans (talk • contribs) 23:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

User talk:TransmogrificationTotalitarian
Users are allowed to remove messages, including warnings, from their own talk pages - the exceptions are block notices and declined unblock requests for blocks currently in effect. I agree with the AIV report, despite no vandalism after level 2 warning - I've undone other edits from the user. Peter&#160;James (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop editing the Teri Ann Linn page
Teri Ann Linn is my fiancee. You who are indicating that these are "Gross BLP" violations need to let me make the changes she has requested.

All photos used are the property of Teri Ann Linn. Our posting of these photos is not a copyright violation.

Ontopgg (talk) 02:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)ontopgg


 * But, are you the copyright holder?  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 02:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Reason I put closure on Blaengwawr and Aberdare High
Because Rhondda Cynon Taff Council are building a super school in Aberdare more info on http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-18368588 which will close down Aberdare Girls, Aberdare High and Blaengwawr. It cost around 350 Million Pounds to build it.

From Quinser's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.26.95 (talk) 17:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Mobissmo
Why did you say I vandalized the Mobissimo page? The edit you cited is where I removed two employees after CAREFULLY RESEARCHING their Linked-in profiles to VERIFY they NO LONGER WORK for Mobissimo. How is that vandalism? The page as you reverted it is INACCURATE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.14.214 (talk) 04:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You broke the parameter num_employees, which will not be parsing this by turning = to a <. Also, that is original research.  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 04:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

You reverted my edits on the Atlantic Coast Conference page. I stated the ACC football champion usually receives a berth in the Orange Bowl unless they were #1 or #2 in the final BCS standings. That is a true statement, and I don't think it should have been deleted.Sphincter boy (talk) 04:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

hi
some people think if they do wrong, they will atrract my attention, they will become a part of immortality and glory.

when people do wrong, :), i beat. i beat very hard. they do become immortal.:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corsika (talk • contribs) 05:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism revert
Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page! --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Reply at my page
Kevin12xd (talk) (contribs)

SEZ u — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:35C5:4FE0:4D58:5F0:D861:AB6F (talk) 19:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

MinklesJMinklesJ (talk) 23:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC) I'm not vandalizing, I'm a Wikipedia luddite. Please do not delete my page!

Dude, she doesn't do porn anymore get your facts right. Don't change it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.110.170.94 (talk) 13:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Asay Fantayzee
Charles R. "Chuck" Asay (pronounced AY-see) (born September 1, 1942, in Alamosa, Colorado) is a conservative political cartoonist. He was an editorial cartoonist for the Colorado Springs Gazette until his retirement from full-time cartooning on March 28, 2007. Previously, he drew for the Taos News, Colorado Springs Sun, and briefly at the Denver Post. He continued to produce editorial cartoons on a freelance basis through syndication by Creators Syndicate until June 2013, when he announced his retirement from all cartooning.

Point out the vandalism or die trying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.6.103 (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

?
Should I see what did you sent to me as threat ? 178.61.44.13 (talk) 20:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Marc Legendre
WP:TRANSLATION is the correct procedure for creating an article from another language when you're unable to translate it properly yourself. What you did does not help anybody, it just adds to an already large backlog-- Jac 16888 Talk 20:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes Behind The No
I see you've been involved with User:Yes Behind The No over the Corina (singer) article. Since there appear to be copyright concerns, and I've been unable to get any response from the contributor, I've now raised the matter at WP:ANI. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism? On Corina(singer) Page
Eyesnore,

How can I avoid being blocked if I make changes to this page which is a page about me, the Artist Corina? I am a newcomer to Wikipedia and appreciate those who have constructed this page however there is some misinformation and outdated information and I am attempting to update the page which is about me and my work. Thaank you! Corina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yes Behind The No (talk • contribs) 01:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleting My Own Page
I wish to delete my article on Ataxia but you have reverted my deletion. Please explain.Fletcherbrian (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You blanked the page Articles for deletion/ATAXIA CURE and replaced it with your comment. Leave other users' comments alone.  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 03:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

When the article is eventually deleted, will the article remain stored away somewhere? Fletcherbrian (talk) 03:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly no.  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 03:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

OK. Thank you for the information. Fletcherbrian (talk) 04:16, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Francisco Rodrigues page
Eyesnore

The editing of Nunca"s page on wikipedia has been done getting information directly with the artists based on facts and references given by the artist himself in some cases and with the knowledge of the artist about the editing.

Consider not re-editing any of the information done by me.

Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.151.16.39 (talk) 03:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Richard Filion
Hi! The article Richard Filion is not very advanced at this point; therefore, some significant references cannot be included just yet since they would not be related directly to the subject matter. The references will, however, be added in a near future. --RandomKelvin (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569258453 your edit] to Primera fila (Thalía album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

STOP REVERTING MY EDITS!
They're constructive! It's not disruptive editing or vandalism so get your facts together before you do it! 76.174.203.54 (talk) 01:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Did you find a source that it is only somewhat long-awaited fake wedding from another site?  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 01:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm the source since most people are too ignorant to realize cartoons have feelings! I know for a fact the wedding is fake because the boy romantically loves me! SO STOP REVERTING MY EDITS! 76.174.203.54 (talk) 01:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Why did you deleted my "Matchday Facts"?!
I wrote simple facts, everone can prove them by doing a littlebit maths. In how far is this a violation of the neutral point of view? And why are those sentences deleted? During Euro 2012 Qualification, they were on every groups article? Are you sure you are helping the Wikipedia Project with this stubbornness?

User:Wiki-HelperCell92 User talk:Wiki-HelperCell92 —Preceding undated comment added 02:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Because that is your own personal analysis and does violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 02:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I feel like i have to add to the discussion, when I saw the editing. Next matchday scenarios should be removed after a discussion on WT:FOOTY because it is WP:OR. I am not sure if we can say it violates WP:NPOV though. To use WP:OR as argument is better in this case, but it is still totally correct to remove it. QED 237   (talk)  10:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Huggle does not yet have a series of warning messages for no original research, but it may be added in the near future.  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 17:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Saint Patrick's Saltire". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 10:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

39.45.79.177 and Kutsuit
I just want to let you know that I listed both users up for edit warring. Reported to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:39.45.79.177_reported_by_User:EuroCarGT_.28Result:_.29 ///Euro Car GT 20:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season
You are as guilty of edit warring at 2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season as anyone. This is not an exception to 3RR. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I apologize about that. It was a content dispute, and I did not handle it.  Eye snore  (pc) 22:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Ted Bohus page
First, I'm not angry or offended.. just wanted to say I can understand the deletion of the addition. The reason I added the separation was to make it specific/distinct, as it is an important issue in regards to the subject. Regardless, all that matters is that the information is there for people to read. Sources have also been provided as links at the bottom of Ted's page for reference. Monroville (talk) 01:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Monroville
 * All caps of the title The Deadly Spawn?  Eye snore  (pc) 01:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Please be more careful
When reviewing content blanking, please be more careful in reverting. This content was at best poorly sourced and contained numerous heavily biased statements. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Michigan Wikipedians role call
Greetings Eyesnore! The Michigan Wikipedians is currently conducting a role call to ascertain which of its members are still active. If you are still an active Michigan Wikipedian, please go to our members list and move yourself from into the active members subsection at the top of the page. On November 1st, all of the members who have not moved themselves into the active members subsection will be renamed inactive members. Even after November 1st, however, any editor can move himself or herself from inactive to active status. Thank you for your participation in the Michigan Wikipedians. As always, you are more than welcome to participate with us, either in person or remotely via the Internet. Take care! Michael Barera (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

unjustifiable tagging and speedy deletion of Olatunde O Isaac
My able and competent editor Eyeshore,am highly disapponted for the unjustifiable deletion of an article titled'Olatunde O Isaac resently created by anonymous editor. When I read through the article before its deletion I was very happy that an article about such a young scientist was published here on wikipedia. The Refrences are good enough,though the context is short but frankly speakin we have shorter article than that here on wilkipedia.you will agree with me that an editor can not know everything about an article,therefore creating a platform for other editor to work on it by expanding it. I know and believed that editors are more experience than one another. Pls I wimplore you as an experience editor to restore the aritcle title'Olatunde o Isaac'(Orimadegun016 (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC))

Ghana national football team
I await your rationale for reverting my edits at Talk:Ghana national football team. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Why?
Hey man, just curious as to why you edited my edit to Justin Bieber's My World Tour. All i said was "Too bad it wasn't his last tour. He is an openly gay singer and music recorder." I want to know why you would relieve the page of my knowledge on a subject i know well on. Please write back, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corvus101 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Doug
Hey there, I thought it was acceptable. It is a positive image that Doug Ford put was comfortable with so I thought it would be fine. I did not see it as wrong and wonder if you would explain to me why it is. I mean no disrespect and would be happy to converse with you. Horkheimer86 (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Except the photo is a non-free file. Wikipedia cannot accept photos off Google Images without the creator's consent.  Zappa  O  Mati   23:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I understand, and at least there is a picture now. I guess I didn't really understand that part of the licensing thing and thought I had it right. I meant no harm and hope we have patched things up. I would not wish to be stricken from editing on Wikipedia--that would be bad. At first I thought you were extremely angry but your reply was quite polite actually and I am appreciative of it. I will try to understand how to source a picture properly in the future (its very confusing!!). Wish you the best, Sincerly Horkheimer86, Nov 7 2013 Horkheimer86 (talk) 00:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Now Why are We Deleting?
Check the status of (os10ac) talk page (NotHaiyanOrThe2013TyphoonYolanda (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC))

Preston Brooks
Thanks for your help on the page. Is there a proper place to report the repeated attempts to whitewash the subject. Edward321 (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Fractional reserve banking
Probably ought to hold off on your reverts as well. Armour is almost certainly getting blocked for a while (edit war report filed) and it's quite obvious he's going to keep reverting no matter what. Just wait until he is blocked so the revert will stay. Ravensfire ( talk ) 01:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

How about try talking in the talk section.Tsar Bomba (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I have to agree, wait for him to get blocked or you risk geting blocked yourself for editwarring or page gets fully protected. QED 237   (talk)  01:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I did request for full protection to stop this edit warring.  Eye snore  (pc) 01:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Then lets flip a coin and hope that the admin dont block the page when Armour has his version. QED 237   (talk)  01:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you afraid of reality, is this why none of you talk in the talk section?Tsar Bomba (talk) 02:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Preston Brooks
Hello. Someone keeps vandalizing the Preston Brooks page. I will not tolerate Dixie-phobic people who believe the South is evil and look down on Southerners. Please allow Preston Brook's own speech to be included on his page.

The Page paints him as a bigot and is very unfair. Brooks never once even voted to expand slavery into new states or territories yet he is now somehow an fervent advocate of slavery???

Wikipedia seems very Dixie-phobic to me. Please END discrimination! Thank You!

CivilWarBufftradition (talk) 02:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your deletion of my comments on John Dalli
You state that you deleted because of copyright reasons. As I did not copy any source, and only used other sources for reference purposes, I would appreciate your detailing the instances where copyright has been infringed. I will remove these as I would not want to infringe wikipedia rules.

Someone has blocked me put of this page. The fact is that there are contributors who are vandalising this site with intent to damage Mr. Dalli. I tried to compile a factual description of events which is well referenced and would like it to be included and protected from vandalism by the likes of "Demdem" and "ritche333".

I would appreciate some help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trabixu (talk • contribs) 18:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

hello, eyesnore i am really sorry for doing that it was a mistake but i think it's back there now, it won't happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.12.91.99 (talk) 20:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
In a recent edit to the page Template:Uw-defamatory1, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. 2AwwsomeTell me where I screwed up.See where I screwed up. 17:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

hey (rpa)
I'm on a fucking cell phone and you scold me about an edit someone made from this IP address in 2k7, I wasn't even alive back then 166.137.12.35 (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
I don't know who you are eyesnore, but I removed PERSONAL INFORMATION that was posted. This information could lead to me being assualted FOR A SECOND TIME over this subject. In addition, the birthdate was WRONG. Before you threaten me again, identify yourself. Provide me with a reason to listen to you. If not, I will be forced to ask for formal mediation. Or legal action cowboy.

Mr.killme (talk) 00:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Eyesnore, I ask that you take more care with your reverts. While this may have appeared to be an obvious case of page blanking, a closer inspection would show that this is a distraught user who is trying to remove personal information from an extremely poorly sourced article. I have revision deleted your reverts as BLP violations. Tiptoety  talk 03:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry man. no need to get butt hurt as my edits where just in fun that is all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.135.220.93 (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

No problem!
I do that all the time. I figure if I quickly undo the accident is understandable. My 2.x gives me error messages often. Maybe I should start fixing Huggle? Thanks for the note! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I should have added "clicked faster than you did! neener-neener!" Jim1138 (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * New updates to dev version 3.0 should be here soon to fix these problems, such as warning or reverting edits of whitelisted users without warning.  Eye snore  (pc) 22:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

There was a legal threat?
I'm a little confused by this, I'm assuming you're referring to this edit, but I didn't see any kind of legal threat in there, is there something I'm missing? I'm asking because it might have confused JohnGoodName as well if he didn't actually make any kind of legal threat is all. Thanks. - Aoidh (talk) 03:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * THe user has not made any civility and possibly continue any peronal attacks or harassment.  Eye snore  (pc) 03:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * True, but that's a WP:NPA issue, not at all an WP:NLT issue, which is rather more serious (and usually results in an immediate, indefinite block for legal reasons). - Aoidh (talk) 03:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * These edits from the warned user didn't appear civil.  Eye snore  (pc) 03:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree, but incivility isn't anywhere near the same (or as serious) as making legal threats is all. - Aoidh (talk) 03:29, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
My apologies for the disappointment expressed on bismuth page. thanks

The shaman poet (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC) 

Barnsley culture edit
Why have you removed my recent addition regarding culture in Barnsley? You clearly have never been to Barnsley and have no idea as to truth of what was written. Barnsley is a very recluse place and residents like to remain loyal and local to their town. The local delicacy of pie,chips, gravy & beans can be purchased from 99% of the towns eateries and i have never met a resident who doesn't indulge in this. 81.136.250.146 (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The content is unsourced. Make sure you provide a source with your changes.  Eye snore  (pc) 16:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
I've created only 3 articles so far, but plan to create more. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you create your 50th valid article you can be a trusted autopatrolled user. I am also planned to make more articles. You just wrote three so far.  Eye snore  (pc) 19:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please refer to this -> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:This_lousy_T-shirt&oldid=593823011#Autopatrolled
 * I'm sure we'll both create at least 50 valid articles. :) —  This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I checked my talk page to see some messages left by your user. I think that my account has been hacked because I've never even heard of Eddie Lack.Kazerisreal (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

STARZ TV (MUSIC CHANNEL)
You accused me of vandalism but I was just updating the old logo to the new one. See they have a new logo here https://twitter.com/StarzTV so I AM NOT VANDALISING THE PAGE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impendingdoom123 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

This IP
This IP is relentless in their vandalism activities. We need to get and admin to stop this Thєíríshwαrdєn  - írísh αnd prσud  20:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The IP address to target is: 81.129.175.242. I already told Mike Rosoft about this.  Eye snore  (pc) 20:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Target IP has been blocked. Thєíríshwαrdєn  - írísh αnd prσud  20:26, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Butt Bridge
My edit was constructive. Please put it back.!!!!!!Put it back now!!!!!!! :( Abby319 (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not putting it back until the statement you added is properly sourced.  Eye snore  (pc) 01:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600970503 your edit] to Hearts Of Darknesses may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * * Bio at Girl Talk Database

Please this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tet_Offensive&diff=601638522&oldid=601636445

Nguyen Quoc Viet's edit is vadalism. He removed the reliable sources, which he don't like. Please stop him!MiG29VN (talk) 06:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * MiG29VN, a sockpuppeteer, POV-pusher, edit warrior, disruptive vandal, reference and content remover must be stopped immediately! Eyesnore, please carefully check your reverts before reversion. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Our dispute, it is our matter. You removed the reliable sources for no reason, that wiki's matter. Please remember, Quoc VietMiG29VN (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Take your own advice. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll accept Nguyễn Quốc Việt's edit. I did not understand that. Nguyễn Quốc Việt's edits are clearly productive, so I will not follow Mig29VN's instructions.  Eye snore  (pc) 15:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * @Eyesnore: I don't want to remove Nguyễn Quốc Việt's edit as you did. I want to restore the reliable sources which he removed (see these lines: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tet_Offensive&diff=601638522&oldid=601636445). Can you help me?MiG29VN (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Nguyễn Quốc Việt made constructive edits to this page by allowing to become more neutral. I don't want to risk being blocked because of EW and 3RR.  Eye snore  (pc) 15:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for extermination/Twelfth Doctor
This is not vandalism. It's a good natured April Fool's joke, so G3 doesn't apply. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There is no Articles for extermination. It is an obvious hoax. Otherwise, happy April Fools' Day!  Eye snore  (pc) 02:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Why do you keep changing NSW to nsw
This is not correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by N8-57469 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Case probably doesn't matter. You also removed an image that is required in the content.  Eye snore  (pc) 01:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Case doesn't matter but for consistency, we use lower case in Infobox Australian place. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 13:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

So, whats my verdict. I am going to be blocked or not
need to know — Preceding unsigned comment added by N8-57469 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked by .  Eye snore  (pc) 16:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

User talk:R00stre
Yes, it did qualify for that. The message was due to me forgetting to uncheck the part where it asks if I want to send a message to the user about it. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism?
How is it even vandalism? Take a look at the site, and you'll see what I mean by a lack of star players for Brazil. Plus, Egypt had a surprising performance from last year's FIBA Africa Championship. If I were to blank the entire article, then it would've count as vandalism, when I'm clearly not. 70.45.68.210 (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The edit fails WP:NPOV and has been reverted.  Eye snore  (pc) 22:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

On the issue of Vandalism, noticed that you deleted my comment - about the US State Department. For does not the speed at which such comments are removed act to reinforce the impression that Wikipedia are cheer-leaders for both this Department and US policy? 78.147.91.207 (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please do not add commentary to an article.  Eye snore  (pc) 23:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Open your eyes to the snoringly obvious facts mate.
Hello eyesnore! I am writing to express my disbelief in you revising my recent input to Justin Marshall's Bio. I'll have you know that everything I wrote on there was factually correct, I have recent surveys to prove the general public no longer idolizes him as they used to because he became cocky nor do they believe he is a good commentator. If you knew anything about Marshall (which I bet you don't because you live in Michigan) you would know that he used to live in Sumner (best place in the world I have surveys to prove this), built on the wrong hill (not Scarborough) and moved to Queenstown to live (bad move, ask anyone). Also FYI Byron Kelleher was by far a better halfback, you could ask almost any kiwi and they would agree, even Cantabrians. Anyway, just thought I'd let you know, because its not good to hide the real facts from the people.

Yours insincerely,

olibolistona Olibolistona (talk) 01:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Olibolistona (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)7/4/2014Olibolistona (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

P.S I'm putting back what I wrote, because its true and not an opinion, if you want to dispute this you can reach me on my tinderor bebo; olibolistona@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olibolistona (talk • contribs) 01:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Matthew Christopher
Hi Eyesnore,

I have made many changes to comply with Biographies

My page was "clean" and now there is another notice. I have provided several references.

Let me know what else is missing.

thanks Matthewchristopher (talk) 12:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Matthew Christopher
Hi

I have tried countless times to keep my page up and need to know precisely Why this keeps getting deleted. I asked the previous editor but did not get a response

Please help me on this

Thx

Matthewchristopher (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello.

I am writing the wiki about Matthew Christopher. I AM NOT Matthew Christopher. Matthew Christopher is a couture wedding gown designer in the league of  Monique Lhuillier. As a matter of fact, i looked at her wiki page to try and make certain all rues were met. Please refer to this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monique_Lhuillier I also added all references and verification you requested.

Please be more specific on what you feel is in violation and I will correct this immediately. This wiki is not advertising or promotion it is an article about a notable person in the couture bridal business.

Matthewchristopher (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Tajik people
Protected this for a week after reverting some copyvio. Do you think there is sockpuppetry going on? If you do, please let me know on my page. Dougweller (talk) 20:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Billericay Town rivalries
The Edit I made to Billericay Town rivalries was both fair and accurate. I've been a supporter for more than 30 years! BTSA1880 (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What you edited is too biased. It has to be written in a neutral point of view.  Eye snore  (pc) 19:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Help!
I was caught in a range block. Could you give me permissions please for an IP block exemption?  Eye snore  (pc) 16:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I've asked Gilliam to confirm, but I believe this was just a misclick of some kind. Just sit tight. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 17:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * hi, just popping in here. Hi there! exoplanetaryscience AKA &#34;generic user&#34; (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It was indeed a mistake on my part. We were apparently reverting at the same time, and I clicked to block the wrong user. Sorry about that!- Gilliam (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Chadron NE
I thought that adding walmart into the post about chadron ne was just as promoting a local business as what I added. I am not promoting any one business. Just letting other wikipedia fans know what chadron is all about. Not just walmart. We have great local business that deserve the same presence as walmart on this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.76.129 (talk) 23:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

My user page
Hi,

I appreciate your effort to keep my user page from harm, but I actually have a "vandalize page here" section on my page deliberately so that people can make nonconstructive edits. I'm hoping it'll keep vandals away from the rest of my page, and also give non-vandals a chance to have a little fun without causing any real harm. Thanks. Someone the Person (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I recommend removing the section because it could potentially attack you. Let them experiment at the sandbox.  Eye snore  (pc) 20:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't mind, really. Someone the Person (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey Eyesnore, sorry for the edit. I was logged into wiki on my computer and my devious friends ..., you get what I mean. Thanks for undoing it. -- Rmehtany

help!
I think I've messed up Children's television series on my phone. Could you revert my edits? Nezzy (Talk) &#124; (Editor contributions) 00:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Miroslaw Close
Miroslaw Close was born in Chrząstowice, Poland. It says so on the same wikipedia webpage. Please delete the reference to him being German if you do not have a verifiable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.104.73.223 (talk) 13:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Allspice/Dorothy Taubman
HI Eyesnore. You left this message on Dorothy Taubman. I didn't make any changes to allspice myself. I'll check this out to make sure it was my IP address that was used.

Thanks!

Laguna greg 22:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laguna greg (talk • contribs)

I have reported you to Walkera, Your information is incorrect
iUAS is not nor is UAS a sub division fo WALKERA stop posting invalid information, and you will be subject to liability from Walkera, so good luck — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.32.16 (talk) 02:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Thread
Your edits that I reverted are constructive?

I can't work out the proper way to send you a message. You can email me at daron.ryan@gmail.com if you want. The article refers to some guy's tournaments but provides no information about the tournament. Following the link to the page about that guy helps very little, if you search for tournament on that page there are no results. As I said it sounds clever but communicates nothing. Words and terminology without meanings are not terminology. They are just noises. Obviously my edit is not constructive but the problem still needs to be fixed. If it can't be fixed it should be removed. There are already far too many people on this planet than just sound clever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.124.187 (talk) 03:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

G'day Mate

A kitten for you!
ILY BEBS

Lolz777 (talk) 04:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 

Blacktown City page
Hi

I made some changes to update the currency of the content displayed on this page, could you please explain why you thought my changes were vandalism.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlacktownCity2014 (talk • contribs) 06:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

adding information and reference
As someone who has edited the article Asian American this year, I am seeking your input on a proposed change to remove a reference to epicanthic eyefolds. This topic has prompted discussion in 2009, 2010 and most recently in 2013.

There's a fine line between being WP:BOLD and subverting WP:CONSENSUS. Given the history of this topic, I'm hoping that a robust discussion, for the record, would improve the article whether this reference stays or goes. Ishu (talk) 13:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

North England
You reverted my edits on the Northern England page because they were "non-constructive". In the North of England it is commonly referred to as the "Socialist North" due to the high concentration of Labour Party seating in it's constituencies, the other additions I made were also constructive as they are also common terms for the area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.40.237 (talk) 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You need to provide a source for these. Also, are there also high concentrations of Russians because of the other name "Tsar's playground"?  Eye snore  (pc) 22:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm Llightex. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ormskirk School because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Llightex (talk) 22:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Because of my eyes, I wasn't able to look what text was added or removed on Huggle.  Eye snore  (pc) 22:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for using the general template, I was using STIki. Llightex (talk) 22:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Why is FoxWeekly NOT a normal magazine, and why should its lemma be allowed to be edited:
Rantic.com, and emmayouarenext.com are hosted on the same server. They are connected to FoxWeekly, who where the first Website who broke the News about Emmayouarenext.

Foxweekly used to be a youtube spammer group named Swenzy (later "SocialVevo") and emmayouarenext.com resembles one of their previous schemes, a website with a countdown to a supposed announcement about the character Brian from Family Guy:

http://archive.is/QesFN

One of the few mentions of Rantic Marketing on google is an article on Foxweekly that was posted 5 days ago and has since been taken down:

http://archive.is/XzZ2T

Foxweekly "reported" on emmayouarenext.com:

http://archive.is/Z1wi3

This got picked up by mainstream media, who are pushing a narrative that Emma is being targeted by "4chan hackers" in retaliation for that feminist speech:

Washington Post: http://archive.is/zY3CR

BBC: http://archive.is/KiXpg

Some others: http://archive.is/VMa3f http://archive.is/rqkSf http://archive.is/eUoJV

Rantic Marketing claimed to have been "hacked by 4chan" before:

http://www.craveonline.ca/gaming/articles/751071-grand-theft-auto-v-pc-cancellation-rumor-debunked

http://imgur.com/NhFVA2X

http://www.dailydot.com/business/swenzy-foxweekly-news-hoax-time-cnn-social-media/

http://www.dailydot.com/business/socialvevo-family-guy-hoax-company/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.109.22.152 (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Saiman Miah
Dear Eyesnore, I invite you to express your opinion about the article for deletion. --Rossi101 (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Rossi101

Inuyasha (character)
I think Inuyasha's character page was not very organized as it was rather messy and I was just trying to make things more clear for people who read it at one point in the future. 109.154.161.254 (talk) 21:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I am sorry. I will be better because of the erroneous detection of score words like "haha" which was not found.  Eye snore  (pc) 21:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

My user space
Please don't make edits in my user space except to leave a comment on my talk page. I have things the way I want them. Thanks. Skyerise (talk) 19:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Please check your page's information and the protection does not expire.  Eye snore  (pc) 19:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

CC date of death
Dear Eyesnore, there was a discrepancy regarding Charles Correa's date of death and I think it needed clarification. Have added a citation to it, thereby correcting it to 16th June, 2015. Yashesh28 (talk) 09:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please don't contact me again I considered your warning biting. VTribut (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * That's some chutzpah. That warning and was well deserved and I see no justification in accusing Eyesnore of biting. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Ryan Kelly (singer)
I didn't create the page-though it did go to me-it seem to be since I moved it right when you did that. Wgolf (talk) 02:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the message. It is likely a bug of Twinkle.  Eye snore  (pc) 02:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem-I sent it to the right person. Wgolf (talk) 02:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Signature
Your signature is unreadable. Please switch back to the default. — Keφr 12:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Can you read this now?  Eye snore  (pc) 14:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That is better. But I also wish you removed the link to Special:PendingChanges from it. You can just bookmark that page, you know. — Keφr 16:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you, if I have any questions about my contributions I 'll let you know, thanks again for the welcome. --Microstar (talk) 01:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Standard GGC Notice
ForbiddenRocky (talk) 23:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Question about reversion
Hi Eyesnore, can I ask why you reverted to this version ? It seems to me that several accounts with a history of disruptive edits want to remove this, and I've attempted to restore it. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 12:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see that the reference is another Wikipedia article. Will look again to see if there's a better source. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 12:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * References should not cite the project itself (in a circle).  Eye snore  12:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Right, and I just noticed that. There are sources that refer to a Romani population within Iran, though I don't know if this is reliable . My attention has been drawn to the behavior of the accounts. Thanks again. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

KIL Fotball Herrer
Hi. Thank you for the review. Sorry that I posted it as an english site. Was supposed to be in the norwegian section. Can you move it there for me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richjans10 (talk • contribs) 03:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

VSAA page
You deleted my addition to the VSAA Wikipedia page. Change it back. TheMasterLlama (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I will only change it back as long as the sources are reliable and you remove the extraneous markup.  Eye snore  20:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I was planning on making the page, then eating, then adding sources. I'm done eating. Ok

IP 74.204.129.155 did at Fitzgerald Toussaint
Yow, you have beaten me man, I'm actually want to revert this vandalism edit did by IP just now. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Sony Creative Software
former: Sony Creative Software is a developer of various media software suites. Sony Creative Software was created in a 2003 deal with Madison media company Sonic Foundry in which it acquired it's desktop product line, hired roughly 60% of employees. paid $18 million in cash, and took on certain liabilities and obligations.

should be: Sony Creative Software is a developer of various media software suites. Sony Creative Software was created in a 2003 deal with Madison media company Sonic Foundry in which it acquired --its-- desktop product line, hired roughly 60% of employees--,-- paid $18 million in cash, and took on certain liabilities and obligations.

I corrected two typos but my edits were deleted with the claim that it was a test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.84.82 (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Royal Corps of Signals edit reverted.
You justify reversion of my edit by describing it as not constructive. Being constructive is not cited as a criterion for content in any encyclopedia, including Wikipedia. The criteria are accuracy and relevance to the topic. This is factually correct and was as widespread as calling the capbadge Jimmy. The language is not strong and it is doubtful that anyone reading about a military unit would have a "fit of the vpours" on reading this. I shall repeat the edit and if it is reverted again, I shall refer it senior editors. Kettering Ken (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Royal Signals page
You have accused me of vandalism, even though the Wikipedia guidelines state that no good faith posting should be deemed vandalism.

Far from being hostile to the Corps, I am a former Signalman, and a life-member of the Royal Signals association. You assert that my post is inaccurate - what knowledge places you in a position to challenge my personal experience? I ask not in order to be confrontational, but genuinely to establish the basis for your claim.

Your user description locates you in the US - do you have service in the British Army or specialist knowledge of Royal signals practices and customs? If not I would politely suggest that the onus is on you to justify your assertions, not on me.

I repeat my affirmation that to my personal knowledge, the motto Certo Cito was almost universally, albeit unofficially translated by Corps personnel as "Shit or Bust".

By their very nature, it is rarely, if ever, possible to provide citations for colloquial usages, I have found reference to this usage on urban dictionary.com.

Kettering Ken (talk) 20:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * If you find a reliable source, I can add it back.  Eye snore  20:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I again stress that I do not wish to be argumentative. Having said this, it would have been helpful had you referred to the need for a reliable source in the initial message. Describing my edit as not being constructive did not make clear the reason for reversion. Vandalism, as I read the Wikipedia description does not apply to any post made in good faith. Regards Kettering Ken (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Kettering Ken (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Untitled section
Are you the one who deleted my contribution to Trust Law's history from this morning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HafizHanif (talk • contribs) 01:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

AfD
Hi : A recent edit you performed at AfD has been reverted. You may want to check it out. North America1000 05:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

13:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC) review of submission by Bucinskas
First of all thanks for taking a look at my article Draft: TrackDuck. Could you go into more detail about the parts of the article that looked like the advertisement? Would love to fix them. Bucinskas (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Section Product saying "TrackDuck solves a problem web developers and designers have when..." appears to read like an advertisement.  Eye snore  13:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Changed the line to not look as advertisement. Are there any other sections that should be improved? Bucinskas (talk) 13:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Make the references show its notability. If you are ready you can resubmit it.  Eye snore  13:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reply. Article is based on the information from sources like Forbes, TechCrunch, Smashing Maganize, Arctic Startup etc., and also several publications in lithuanian language. Publications in all of the sources doesn't seem to be written by the company that i'm covering. Resubmitted the article. Will this be a problem for other articles as well? I'm planning to cover all of the notable startups in Lithuania and Baltics.

smaller states and peacemaking
The introductory paragraphs were edited with your comments in mind. A few other minor edits in the body of the entry were also undertaken.

GOVT574 (talk) 16:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

The New England Colonies and the English Civil Wars
Hi Eyesnore, Thank you very much for looking at the draft for this article. Could I ask your opinion on a change to hopefully make it more eligible for future re-submission?, I do agree to an extent with your summarisation that it could possibly have been included into the article regarding the English Civil War, however the current trends of academic discourse on the English Civil War, and upon Colonial America, unfortunately do not yet commonly recognise their common ground. Historians of the English Civil War generally consider the role of American colonists as being to insignificant to the narratives of the conflicts. Similarly, Colonial American Histories generally look to the English Civil War only in the context of creating a causal relationship of ideologies with the later Wars of Independence, and do not fully recognise the importance of the conflicts in the context of the Colonial narratives. I discussed this at length with members of the History Department at Teesside University, and following that I decided it was best to create this as a separate page, rather than attempting to insert 5000 words into an area lightly to dismiss it as unnecessary. Given that, do you think changing the title to 'The New England Colonies in the context of the English Civil Wars' would be a better option?

Kind Regards, RDJTeesside (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

11:29:16, 13 May 2016 review of submission by GOVT574
Hi, I am writing to let you know we've updated smaller states and peacemaking and are awaiting a re-review. The lead section, which seemed to be most problematic, has been resolved. Other edits have been throughout the entry as well.

Peace.

GOVT574 (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Eyesore, I am inserting missing information in the safari trek motorhome page. One inserted I plan to put into a gallery format...please reply back

King e (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Wait
Profile The Builder needs an indef block from Wikipedia, I'll be pinging a bunch of admins to see if anyone is around, don't bother entering an edit war on their talk page. It's almost never appropriate to revert an editor on their talk page except to remove PA's, copyvios, or to re-instate an unblock request. Warnings are free for the editor remove, as per WP:UP. Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * already blocked by, so no need to notify an admin to do so.  Eye snore  14:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Welp, too late, by literally 1 min... Mr rnddude (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Reagarding the edit I have been attempting to make on the Brutality band page: I am trying to figure out how to make this edit. It is a true and correct fact that Larry Sapp is now Raine Von Kiska. She wants her name listed on the page of the band that she founded years ago. I am obviously not technically savvy enough to figure this out, so once I accomplish getting my friends name corrected on her old band page I will most likely be done for a while. Here are several published online sources verifying  the information I am trying to edit: https://www.discogs.com/artist/1474948-Larry-Sapp http://www.metal-archives.com/artists/RVK/129877 https://www.discogs.com/artist/252275-Brutality http://www.metalstorm.net/bands/band.php?band_id=3648 https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1268402 https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-gay-death-metal-vocalists

How do I get this done? I keep getting accused of vandalism. This is not vandalism, I am trying to make the page accurate  and give Raine her proper credit.Sunnybunny5us (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Reverts.
Hello Eyesnore! My question is that why did you revert my edits? I simply added bits of text from the actual description of the image, simple as that. The image has been made by photoshop, says the description of the image. I don't find anything non-neutral in my edits. Could you open up your thougts for me? Kindest regards 2001:14BB:80:637E:65E5:C571:E7E1:C372 (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Your recent edits are now more neutral to me. I can take that.  Eye snore  21:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Change the Fifth Harmony members because someone changed it Idkfifthharmonylol (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Television content rating systems, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''When adding information to articles or making changes to existing information please ensure that your edits are consistent with the sources in the article. If not you must provide further citations so that the updated information can be corroborated per WP:Verifiability.'' Betty Logan (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Please double check the sources
I have noticed you have been a doing a lot of work on content ratings articles, and while much of it has improved the articles sometimes mistakes have creeped in such as your alterations at Motion picture rating system. It may not seem a big deal, but words like "parent" and "guardian" are not always the same as "adult" i.e. you can get underage parents, and also a guardian doesn't always have to be a legal guardian in some systems. Some cultures require an adult, while in others a responsible person such as an elder sibling is sufficient. It is best to not make assumptions and to try and stick to the official wording as much as we possibly can, and this will leave less room for misinterpretation. Please don't take this note as a censure because I think you do a good job for the most part, but if you are going to alter the wording please double check the sources provided to ensure you are not actually altering the meaning of the rating. Betty Logan (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Comparison table color schemes
There is a discussion about the color schemes at articles such as Motion picture rating system at Talk:Motion_picture_rating_system if you would like to participate. Betty Logan (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

requesting help with biographical page
This is about a biographical page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Sackner_Bernstein

Hello, I hope you can give me some guidance on how to improve a wiki page that you edited on April 26, 2016. Others provided enough changes to allow the page to be published, and I've corrected a couple of errors. Today I reviewed the text to pinpoint things I could change to be confident it does not appear sufficiently objective in its information and style. I found one spot where the text referred to my having the largest experience with an experimental drug. While true, I do not have a citation for that, so i inserted a new citation and revised the language from "the largest" to "a large."

When you have time to review the page again, can you give me pointers for information to add or wording to change so that the template message can be removed?

Appreciate your help.

Jonathansb (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)jonathansb

Santa Rosa
Hi. I understand you, but I'm not totally wrong:

(Köppen climate classification)

The second letter indicates the precipitation pattern—w indicates dry winters (driest winter month average precipitation less than one-tenth wettest summer month average precipitation; one variation also requires that the driest winter month have less than 30 mm average precipitation[dubious – discuss]), s indicates dry summers (driest summer month less than 40 mm average precipitation and less than one-third wettest winter month precipitation) and f means significant precipitation in all seasons (neither above-mentioned set of conditions fulfilled).[1] Scheridon (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * "one variation also requires that the driest winter month have less than 30 mm average precipitation" (Just a variation that only adds a new constraint; this cannot replace the common criteria of "driest winter month average precipitation less than one-tenth wettest summer month average precipitation")  Eye snore  19:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced changes at Motion picture rating system
I appreciate the assistance in keeping the article up to date and correcting inaccuracies but it needs to be done in the right manner, so before initiating any more edits at Motion picture rating system will you please respond to my concerns at Talk:Motion_picture_rating_system. Betty Logan (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiva Murugan Temple


A tag has been placed on Shiva Murugan Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi
How do you start a page for a soccer player? Pman81 (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just introduce the name of the person, the person's date of birth (if known), then the person's talent or roles, not rephrasing the title.  Eye snore  20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hello Eyesnore. Your account has been added to the " " user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk. The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC) PS: Please do not use AWB to patroll pages. That's not what it was designed for. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
 * Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
 * OK, Now I understand that AutoWikiBrowser is not designed for patrolling new pages.  Eye snore  16:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello Eyesnore,

I noticed that you reviewed the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LexShares. I have addressed the orphan tag you created by incorporating LexShares into the crowdfunding and Litigation funding pages.

Is there anything else I need to do before I can view this page on search engines?

Thanks!

Mrong817 (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

MfD nomination of User:Eyesnore
User:Eyesnore, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eyesnore and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Eyesnore during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

MSE
Hello

You have edited Microsoft Security Essentials article and said MSE is not available for download on Vista anymore.

But it is: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5201

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Ubisoft San Francisco listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ubisoft San Francisco. Since you had some involvement with the Ubisoft San Francisco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 08:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

The Circle
I will tell you like I told the IP user -- there's no reason to update the reviews in real time. Once a week is fine. But certainly not more than once a day. Kellymoat (talk) 23:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Blockbuster LLC
I see where you made a recent update on Blockbuster, LLC's page. You added BLIAQ and BLIBQ as its ticker symbols. Can you tell me where you got your source for these stocks belonging to Blockbuster LLC? I'm a long time Blockbuster follower. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkalex (talk • contribs) 20:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Rkalex (talk) 20:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You can check its profile here.  Eye snore  20:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

That would be the tickers for Blockbuster, Inc now named BB Liquidating. Blockbuster LLC became "New Blockbuster" after the asset sell to Dish and is still listed as a private company. Although there may still be a connection between the two. Which is what led me to question. I had hoped you had ran across some more information. Thanks Eyesnore. Rkalex (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Alliance for a better utah - What the ?
YOu suggested deleting the page. The page got deleted. You never responded to the comments. Much work went into it. You did not read it. You just made a judgment that it was promotional. Did you check a link? What was promotional? It was information. Please provide a specific example of what was promotional and not informational. I don't like being attacked and having work erased without cause. Provide a specific example of how it was promotional.Lux-veritas (talk) 11:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * please read WP:SOAP so you understand it better.  Eye snore  11:24, 22 June 2017

Dear Eyesnore:

Thank you. I took the time. I re-read it. I focused on this part:

"Advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. Wikipedia articles about a company or organization are not an extension of their website or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so. Contributors must disclose any payments they receive for editing Wikipedia. See also Wikipedia:Conflict of interest." source: []

What part of the page was biased or with puffery? What was not linked or sourced? What was endorsed? What was not verifiable by an independent source? Give an example please.Lux-veritas (talk) 11:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You should also read WP:TONE. Make sure that the source is written in an encyclopedic tone.  Eye snore  11:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Dear Eyesnore: Thank you again. I read your link on tone. What part of the entry was in the wrong tone? I based the entry off another entry that's been around for decade+, that site is for a similar organization named Judicial Watch (www.judicial-watch.org and wikipedia page for Judicial Watch. The tone mirrors that ten+ year old article's tone. Again, provide me with an example of what was wrong in my post so I can learn. Please.Lux-veritas (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Ask an administrator if they can restore the page for you to improve it. Make sure that it also meets WP:GNG.  Eye snore  11:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Dear Eyesnore: I appreciate your responses and helping me learn. I really would have appreciated an example but alas, not all is going to go as one wishes. I will follow your instructions and contact an administrator. Thank you again for your wiki contributions. Cheers. LuxLux-veritas (talk) 11:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * deleted your new article. You can ask him or another administrator to undelete the page.  Eye snore  11:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Not quite ready? Make your new article through the Draft namespace at Draft:Alliance for a Better Utah. Regards,  Eye snore  11:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your service.Lux-veritas (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Jalopy
I thank you sir for the tag to improve my article, By the way its nice to see your page that you're also from Philippines because I'm a Filipino too. I have gathered more information about the article. If you can, I want you to check my article if i must gather more.

My thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by TravisGTAGamer (talk • contribs) 13:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:
 * WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags
 * Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:
 * A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons
 * There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy
 * Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English News Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
 * Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
 * The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
 * Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: NPPbarnstar SE.png. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: RR3217-0014 100 rubles USSR 1989 Gold avers.png, Swiss-Commemorative-Coin-1991-CHF-250-reverse.png, Coin of Kazakhstan 500Thinker averse.png, US-$1000-SC-1878-FR-346a-PROOF.jpg.
 * Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

draft help
hello sir could you please assist me regarding my draft Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat. AR.Dmg (talk) 12:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay. I examined the draft. My suggestion is to expand it with reliably sourced references.  Eye snore  13:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of OLX.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of OLX.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18


Hello ,

, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
 * Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
 * Reliable Sources for NPP

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
 * Backlog drive coming soon


 * News
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.


 * Discussions of interest
 * A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
 * There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
 * What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Logo of OLX.svg


The file File:Logo of OLX.svg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused logo, no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019


Hello ,

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important. Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR. The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever. NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so  you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations. Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for  the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging. Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * QUALITY of REVIEWING
 * Backlog
 * Move to draft
 * Notifying users
 * PERM
 * Other news

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amazon rainforest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonas ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Amazon_rainforest check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Amazon_rainforest?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello ,

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
 * Backlog

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
 * Coordinator

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for  making  the occasional  mistake while  others can learn from  their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
 * This month's refresher course

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
 * Deletion tags

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
 * Paid editing


 * Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
 * Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent  enhancements to  the New Pages Feed and  features in the Curation  tool, and there are still more to  come. Due to the wealth  of information  now displayed by  ORES, reviewers are strongly  encouraged to  use the system now rather than Twinkle; it  will  also  correctly  populate the logs.
 * Not English
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
 * Tools

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello ,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. There are now holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action. Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays. Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox. Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards. Admin has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13. The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting the queue to 0
 * Coordinator
 * This month's refresher course
 * Tools
 * It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
 * It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
 * Reviewer Feedback
 * Second set of eyes
 * Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
 * Do be sure to have our talk page  on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
 * Arbitration Committee
 * Community Wish list

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019


This year's Reviewer of the Year is. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
 * Reviewer of the Year

Special commendation again goes to who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to and  who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by.
 * Redirect autopatrol

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
 * Source Guide Discussion

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This month's refresher course

Alex Portelli Page
Hello Eyesnore,

Could you please reinstate the page I created for Alex Portelli. The name on the article was wrong. It was Alex M Portelli instead of Alex Portelli. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Jaredfontaine2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaredfontaine2002 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)