User talk:Eyesonchrist

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Krystal Meyers has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- Menti  fisto  03:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Talk:Krystal Meyers constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 03:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Talk:Krystal Meyers. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. TheFeds 04:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Song notability
Please read the policy on when a song merits its own article: "Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for a prominent album or for the artist who wrote or prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." That song has not reached a chart or won awards, and is a stub with no independent, broad coverage.

See all the criteria for inclusion at WP:MUSIC. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Removed content? I changed a couple words and now I will see about another source. Grow up.

The Beauty of Grace
I suggest you change the name of the article so it is accurate. Thank you. --Wolfer68 (talk) 22:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:KrystalMeyersMainPress.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrystalMeyersMainPress.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I've deleted this image again. You seem to have misunderstood our image policy. For living people (such as Krystal Meyers) we only host free images. If you can convince here or her agent to release an image under a free licence then we can host it, if not we can't - Peripitus (Talk) 11:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Krystal-Meyers-Press-Kit-Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Krystal-Meyers-Press-Kit-Photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 08:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

File:AREA-ENGLISH-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AREA-ENGLISH-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

File:NYLON-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NYLON-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Uniqlo-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uniqlo-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Peripitus (Talk) 10:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Magazine Covers and Modeling for Krystal Meyers
I read this and it leaves it up to your interpretation so you can basically remove any image you want and there is nothing anyone but God can do about it. "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."

All I can do is recommend this: You need to leave two of these in there. I am getting married to Krystal Meyers so if you remove them I will put them on her site and link to it from the words in the article. I feel they add to the article. I will compromise with you now if you wish and I will leave File:AERA-ENGLISH-with Krystal-Meyers-2.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Uniqlo-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg because it makes a better article. I have already made these changes.

I'd also like this one left available for later use: File:AREA-ENGLISH-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg I will talk to Krystal and see if she would rather have it than File:AERA-ENGLISH-with Krystal-Meyers-2.jpg on her page.

Scheduled for deletion:

File:NYLON-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg

File:AREA-ENGLISH-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg (keep for possible later use)

File:AERA-ENGLISH-with Krystal-Meyers-2.jpg (keep)

File:BOUNCE-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg

File:Uniqlo-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg (keep)
 * Congratulations on your upcoming marriage. The issue is that Wikipedia, as a matter of policy, seeks to only host free content ("Wikipedia&mdash;The free encyclopedia"). Consequently the requirements for hosting copyrighted images, like the ones you have uploaded, are strict and designed to exclude most images. Making a better article or being decorative are insufficient reasons for us to keep the images. You need to clearly show what significant understanding of Krystal a reader gains by having the image and how this could not be achieved through free content (like a simple photo of her). - Peripitus (Talk) 20:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The best method is to follow the process at Contact us/Photo submission, noting that the communication needs to be from the copyright holder. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:KrystalMeyersmyLove.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:KrystalMeyersmyLove.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:KrystalMeyers-ido.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:KrystalMeyers-ido.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Aspects (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:OneWorldOneDream.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:OneWorldOneDream.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk  03:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Worship Leader
Can you add a paragraph that defines/clarifies that she is/is not a worship leader, citing what wikipedia considers to be a reliable source. I've see this debate (she is/she is not) on various fan and anti-fan sites.jonathon (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Krystal Meyers. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. St Anselm (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

I only have to save animals and people and ride a bicycle around getting pain 7.25 an hour. If you are so omniciant whydon't you put some effort into it and put a decent picture up there? You know why you don't. You want me to _______ do it and I made every page she has and I don't have the patience anymore so ______ put up a picture of you up here for all I ______ care.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Krystal Meyers. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. StAnselm (talk) 03:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Krystal Meyers inactivity
Please see Talk:Krystal Meyers. There is a discussion taking place regarding her inactivity. --Djc wi (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Krystal Meyers has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Please don't make negative comments about living people in your edit summaries. StAnselm (talk) 23:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

ELs and Krystal Meyers
Please read WP:EL, particularly the sections titled "Restrictions on linking" and "Links normally to be avoided". I won't reproduce them here, but in short the videos are against the first one and the ELs section should be linked to from the official website. Although the videos may be acceptable per WP:YOUTUBE. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The ones in Wordpress are a definite violation. The ones iTunes are a different vioation: linking to commercial material (a.k.a WP:SPAMLINKS). And they're formatted incorrectly. Song titles are quoted. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Bad changes
I have noticed you've made a few changes like this recently. The main problem is that you simply changed the URL and not the titles, etc. So the original URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybeJDrk5sa4 actually has a title and content, while your edit doesn't share that content. I'm afraid I'm going to return to those original videos. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, Eyesonchrist. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Krystal Meyers, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''Since the video you just uploaded and all the blogs you've been linking to are associated with the account or name "Krystal Norman", it may not be appropriate for you to be editing an account about the subject except to add new information. Changing URLs to "preferred" locations is definitely not appropriate.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Adding references can be easy
Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:
 * 1) While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
 * 2) Then click on "Templates".
 * 3) Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
 * 4) Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
 * 5) Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
 * 6) Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.
 * Before clicking on Save page, check that a References header  ==References==  is near the end of the article.
 * And check that    is directly underneath that header.
 * 7.Click on Save page. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.

Hope this helps, --Shearonink (talk) 04:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * To use this message, place  on User:talk pages when needed.

Krystal Meyers
I have reverted your change to the Krystal Meyers article. Yes, the website itself still exists BUT the cited information as cited no longer appears at that link so it does indeed suffer from link rot or is "dead" (since the content has changed). You should find another source for it or see if it's available through some of the tools found at WP:DEADREF. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 17:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

E-sword
Please stop these sorts of edits. They are not within the scope of an encyclopedia. Rmhermen (talk) 21:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to read WP:3RR as you may be blocked soon i you violate this policy. Rmhermen (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

You used so many different people removing my edits for no reason at all then you to come back with if I undo your revisions 4 times that’s a violation that can get me blocked. So, that was a set up since you said nothing to base those on, what was I to do but undo it so you'd threaten to block me. So now I have to wait 24 hours now to probably go through the same thing again. I better not have to. So in other words people if Wikipedia does not want you to write something they can keep it off for no violation at all, expect to violate you for undoing them from removing what you wrote. You write it. The remove it for no reason. You write it, they remove it for no reason. You write it they remove it for no reason then they block you. And this whole process uses several people so each one can have plausible deniability.

As to my reasons for why I can post to Wikipedia what I had (and if you have guidelines against this then that is what you use, not immature, baseless childish games).

1. People do not download e-sword to get untruth. The whole idea is to get the Biblical truth. So, challenges to it teaching Biblical truth is a valid challenge. And if one person starts the ball rolling there may be many more people who would post their challenges to it’s Biblical accuracy.

2. People expect the writers of these downloads to be not be hypocrites. If they teach to not lie they cannot then make vast productions that are entirely lies. If they teach that it is wrong to pervert justice then they cannot pervert justice. If someone is out there who says Rick Meyers has perverted justice then that is as valid if he is dirt poor and says so on his blog or was rich able to get a book published about it. Or is Wikipedia class based, where only the rich have a voice considered true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyesonchrist (talk • contribs) 22:12, 31 December 2013‎
 * You claim to be related to the subjects of the articles you are editing. You should read WP:Conflict of interest. It would be best if you added your information only to the talk page and let other non-involved editors judge the appropriateness of adding it to the article. Rmhermen (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:E-Sword. Thank you.


 * Your allegations there are not germane to the article. As you have been plainly warned about such conduct before, you are making it hard for others to assume that you are editing in good faith. If you continue misusing Wikipedia to publish potentially libellous material, you will be blocked. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Signing
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Unblocked as requested at User talk:VisionaryGuy
As you requested at User talk:VisionaryGuy (and on my talk page), I have re-enabled this account and blocked that one instead. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

BLP violation
I had to revdel the summary here due to gross BLP violation. If you do that again, you will be indef blocked. By the way, this may not stop another admin from deciding that an indef block is still warranted. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  18:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note that it has now been oversighted. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  18:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Warning
Your last four edits have been deleted and suppressed as violations of core policy. If you continue in this vein, you will be blocked from editing without further warning. Guy (Help!) 11:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Krystal+Meyers+Norman.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krystal+Meyers+Norman.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Nil Einne (talk) 02:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Your addition to Krystal Meyers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Your addition to Krystal Meyers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. StAnselm (talk) 23:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Krystal Meyers in 2008 at 20 years old at radio interview.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Krystal Meyers in 2008 at 20 years old at radio interview.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neil N  talk to me 03:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threat. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 03:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 03:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 03:58, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of My Freedom


The article My Freedom has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable single, no reviews, never charted"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)