User talk:Ezekiel3319

Welcome!
Hello, Ezekiel3319, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wikipedia:Truthseeker, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Johnj1995 (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Truthseeker


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Truthseeker, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm -Alabama-. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User talk:Dronebogus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -Alabama- (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * It was extremely constructive as well as relevant. Thought I would let you know. Ezekiel3319 (talk) 18:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Dronebogus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -Alabama- (talk) 18:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:-Alabama-, you may be blocked from editing. -Alabama- (talk) 18:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * We will see. Ezekiel3319 (talk) 18:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Some advice
If you continue in the way you have started, before long you will be blocked from editing by an administrator. I advise you to change your ways. Don't do any vandalism or "joke" editing, don't modify other editors' messages on talk pages, and don't attack other editors, as for example calling them "dummy". In fact, if you are here to make constructive contributions to the encyclopaedia then stick to doing that, and if you aren't then find something else to spend your time on. JBW (talk) 18:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your "concern." In what world is "don't be a dummy" the same as "you are a dummy?" I find my edits to be extremely constructive, and I may be mistaken, but this is an open source info page, correct? The user "Alabama" began an edit war and attacked me immediately. As a new user, this was not encouraging. Ezekiel3319 (talk) 19:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * You may take my advice or not, as you please. However, I can assure you that if you continue with the kind of edits you posted to User talk:Dronebogus, whether you regard them as "extremely constructive" or not, you will be blocked from editing before long. JBW (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)