User talk:Ezelee

There is a vast amount of information that one can learn while using the internet. Most people are hesitant to allow their children to have access to computers because they are worried about predators that may try to contact their children. The real question is, whether or not they are protecting their children by not allowing them online access? Some would argue that they are, and others would sat that they are inhibiting them from the exuberant amount of knowledge they can receive by using the internet. I am not sure where I stand in the arguement.

Coincidentally, yesterday was the 25th anniversary of the release of Prince's or the artist formally known or whatever he calls hiself nowadays, album "Purple Rain." He has had a long and successful carrer. Congratulations to him and his success.

When baking an apple pie, I find it more tatseful to boil the apples before placing them into the pie crust. I hate it when I eat an apple pie that has crunchy apples, it makes the experience not so pleasing. I also like to sprinkle a littl bit of sugar on the crust to gave it more of a sweeter taste. When baking an apple pie please take precaution.

Most jazz musicians during the 1940's and 50's were under paid and unappreciated. Most of these artist would waive away their copyrights and are now receiving monetary compensation for the copyrights that some feel they rightfully deserve. So, if you appreciate a good jazz song from the swing or bop era, chances are the musician was under compensated for his/her efforts.

When I mention the words evangelistic speaker what comes to mind? Is it a individual standing on a soap box telling the masses that they are going to hell if they do not follow the commandments, or simply someone that feels pasionate about their belief's and wants the whole world to hear. Chances are, that it is not the latter. There are too many crazys out there that feel it is their duty to spread the word; even if that means suffocating people with it.

The only way to reach a person is either through, clarity and control of ones tongue or with an extreme act of violence. Chances are, that the violent act would just beget another violent act. I would use the ease of the tongue; the pen is in fact, mighter than the sword!

Some times I wonder if it is easier on the eyes to read things printed on paper rather then on a computer screen. I was told by many individuals that staring at a computer screen for several hours at a time can seriously impair your vision. Remind me not to major in computer technology. I should ask my eye doctor if this is true. In the mean time, I print any long documents that I have to read for school, to spare my eyes and not the environment.

Is it not funny that we as humans can hear a song on the radio five or six times and then know all the lyrics if not most of them. Why do we not apply that same type of repitition to learning more important things in life, like our state politicans stance on any political issue we feel passionate about. Let us get more involved people,but first I will start with myself before I stand on this box.

Have you ever met a person that was actually alergic to plastic. I saw this in a movie once with Nicolas Cage but never in real life. I wondering if anyone really has this problem; and if so, I bet it is only like one percent of the worlds population. They would probably have to eat with chop sticks and silverware.

Why do people use the term copywritten when it is really expressed copyrighted. I know attorneys that specialize in entertainment law that state it the incorrect way as well. Do you know what you are actually copyrighting. It is the expression of ideas that has been placed in some sort of tangible form. Of coarse this can be many different things, that is why some have made a profession arguing over who has the proper copyright rights.

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. // Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 20:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to San Jose, California. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ikluft (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Gilroy, California. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ikluft (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Santa Cruz, California. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ikluft (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Salinas, California. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ikluft (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Warning
You may not have noticed, but the majority of your edits have been removed. This is not necessarily because they are in correct; rather, they seem to be poorly written, duplications of material found elsewhere in the article, or unsourced commentary. Please have a look at our manual of style to see how we prefer our articles to be written. Persistent poor quality edits may be seen as disruptive and could lead to a block on your ability to edit. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to help. // Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 21:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 05:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)