User talk:F.Charlotte

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORAZI (July 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORAZI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ORAZI Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ORAZI reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  02:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Thanks for improving the article. It is very well written. But there is an issue with the references. AS WP:REF there references must be verifiable i.e the reviewers are ought to have access to the cited sources. But as I can see, most of the references you have provided are a accessible. Please provide links to them and if not possible get them verified by an OTRS request. You can request it at WP:OTRS. Regards,  KC Velaga  ✉  09:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see Offline sources. OTRS can not verify offline sources, and there's no such requirement on Wikipedia. Verifiability means that some editors can verify the information (if required) by accessing the sources assuming that they have appropriate access. It does not require that all editors be able to easily verify the sources. If you have serious doubts about a specific source or you can't even verify that the source exists, you could possibly request at WP:RX to gain access via someone else. ~ Rob 13 Talk 06:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:ORAZI has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ORAZI. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORAZI (September 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORAZI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ORAZI Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ORAZI reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)