User talk:F.Moshammad/sandbox

Mtrowers (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit #1 Pre-edit review
Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review:	5/15/2013

Name of editor:	Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length of edit wasn’t too long but was short and simple

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes used textbook information

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes I/O Psych is adherent

Wikiformatting: Good Formatting

Grammar & composition: Good grammar & composition

Other comments: Bulletin points were a good choice!

User:A_Bhagwandin (talk)

Ant N York (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-edit reviews Edit # 1
Angela Sandy (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Hmehta0120

Date of review:	 4/24/2013

Name of editor: F. Moshammad

URL of editor’s Userpage:	 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 4/24/2013

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/24/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short): I find it pretty lengthy but then again, you are discussing two different type of test the Interest test and Aptitude test. Image (needed/appropriate): N/A (read comment in comment section) Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit):Very much accurate to the textbook information and got the most important parts out from them.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed:N/A---textbook base Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): N/A---textbook base

Wikiformatting:	Very well for matting. Grammar & composition: Well put together and stated. Didn’t find any mishaps Other comments:	 Seem great to me, great idea to add test base to the article. The length of it seems well enough to support information to both tests. Only advice is try to see if you could become creative with it (such as bullet points and etc). Side note if you do add an image to the page such as someone taking the test from clip art, or example of one of your test would add more character to the page.

Hmehta0120 (talk) 03:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

F.Moshammad (talk) 03:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page**!! Wikipedia User:Fernando18
 * Date of review || 5/1/2013
 * Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**|| Wikipedia F.Moshammad
 * URL of editor’s Userpage || http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 5/1/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 5/1/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) ||Good length
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || need a image if possible
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Very accurate
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || Primary
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Good article and topic
 * Wikiformatting || N/A
 * Grammar & composition || None
 * Other comments|| Very informative
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || need a image if possible
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Very accurate
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || Primary
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Good article and topic
 * Wikiformatting || N/A
 * Grammar & composition || None
 * Other comments|| Very informative
 * Wikiformatting || N/A
 * Grammar & composition || None
 * Other comments|| Very informative
 * Grammar & composition || None
 * Other comments|| Very informative
 * Other comments|| Very informative

Pre edit peer review
{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer !! Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey Joan Bailey (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Date of review || 5/15/2013
 * Name of editor|| Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad
 * URL of editor’s Userpage ||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 05/15/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 05/15/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) ||The length of the edit is not too long. It is a good amount.
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || N/A
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook information is accurately edited.
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || None.
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || The information presented is related to I/O Psychology.
 * Wikiformatting || The formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition are good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job.
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || N/A
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook information is accurately edited.
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || None.
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || The information presented is related to I/O Psychology.
 * Wikiformatting || The formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition are good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job.
 * Wikiformatting || The formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition are good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition are good.
 * Other comments|| Nice job.
 * Other comments|| Nice job.