User talk:F00188846

Please do not continue to insert non-reliable sources like Anwers in Genesis, as you have done on the Homo floresiensis page here and here. Repeated addition of material that does not come from reliable sources may be considered edit warring, and could lead to you being blocked. Edhubbard 22:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Silly rabbit 14:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

'''In regards to your claims of vandalism on the Creation Science page, Wikipedia policy specifically states that neither Bold Edits nor Stubbornness can be considered as vandalism. The changes made do not fall under any category of what constitutes vandalism.'''


 * If you read it as you wish to read it. POV edits do not count as being bold (a concept that does not, contrary to some viewpoints equate to being reckless).  Constantly trying to force them into the article against consensus is roughly equal to vandalism.  Keep in mind the WP has myriad policies that are interrelated.  I would suggest that you look a bit more closely at WP:V, WP:VAND, WP:NOT, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR just to name a few.  &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  20:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Silly rabbit 18:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Please try to be reasonable
An edit war like you seem to be engaged in on creation science will not serve your purposes. You will only get your changes undone, and possibly get yourself blocked or banned for your trouble. You are currently in violation and I suspect can be blocked at any time now. I am asking you nicely, and trying to help you out. If you want major changes, try to get consensus first on the talk page. If you can get consensus, and other editors agree, then the changes can be implemented. Please try not to be so disruptive.--Filll 18:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Escalating warnings for creation science
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. You cannot use sock puppets to avoid this rule.--Filll 19:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)