User talk:FA1320

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Fulbright Association. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fulbright Association. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fulbright Association was changed by FA1320 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860433 on 2012-06-13T21:38:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Fulbright Association
Hello, FA1320. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 22:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I see that you are working to improve the Fulbright Association article. Please review the information above regarding conflict of interest, and then take another try at the article. I recommend starting with adding some references to reliable third-party sources, and then fleshing the article out using the information from those sources. If you have specific questions, feel free to drop me or another editor a note on our talk pages. Good luck, and Happy Editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 22:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)