User talk:FALOOP

NewBlueFX
A tag has been placed on NewBlueFX, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of NewBlueFX and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 03:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. You stated that you had "Improved neutrality of text", and then deleted several important templates, when in fact the only change was a minor rejig of one sentence that did not address the concerns with the article. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Ckatz chat spy  07:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)