User talk:FAV47

Regarding edits made 03:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alan DeBoer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alan DeBoer was changed by FAV47 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-08-15T03:48:04+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 03:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Cobi(t 03:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: references
Please see Reliable sources for more information about references. Also, see Notability (people) for more information about notability. Basically, you need to show where other people have written about him. A list of past employers is not a list of sources. --Onorem♠Dil 01:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

My page: Alan DeBoer, has been recommended for removal by User Carlossuarez46. This user believes I need more references. I have two reliable, and correct references in # 4 and 5., and all references are true and correct. What more should I do?

FAV47 15:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

It seems that you have blanked the page a couple of times, so I'm not really sure you want to keep the article in any event. But, if Mr. DeBoer is notable (per WP:N and WP:BIO) then he must have significant coverage in 3rd party reliable sources (see WP:RS). Anyone could construct the article you have and titled it "Joe Blow" - there's no way to check whether (a) it's real, and (b) he's notable. If Mr. DeBoer has not received the significant coverage as outlined in our standards for inclusion then he should not have an article at Wikipedia. This is no reflection on him as a person or as a DJ - he could be outstanding but just that no reliable third parties have covered him significantly. Carlossuarez46 17:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)