User talk:FAWG

November 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Julie & Julia because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Rosemary Hume. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. &#91;Username Needed&#93; 14:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

I feel that adding a link to https://www.cordonbleu.edu/london/coronation-chicken/en on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemary_Hume would be highly relevant and would add value tohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemary_Hume. Perhaps it's worth adding an External Links section on that page?

Sockpuppet investigation
pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Rosemary Hume. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 7_qz (ゆっくりしていってね!) 14:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)