User talk:FBFP

Final Cut Pro article
Yes, Final Cut Pro is developing a larger user group, but not to the point it is ‘seriously’ challenging the monopoly of Avid. Using this logic, it’s safe to say Windows Movie maker is seriously challenging the monopoly of Avid. Avid have over 2800 feature film editing seats. Final Cut have under 100. Yup, that’s challenging Avid’s Monopoly. I apologize for taking your comment so seriously,--AvidLiquid 04:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, AvidLiquid, from around 2001 on FCP has eclipsed Avid in music video and commercial use, and from about 2002 major studios began trusted use of Final Cut Pro. Since that time, with editors like Walter Murch and Angus Wall commiting themselves to FCP, we've seen a steep rate of adoption within the feature film community.  Avid has a devoted market share, to be sure -- and it's a fine product -- but the trajectory of the market share of FCP has Avid, rightly, shaking in its shoes.  It surely has your feathers ruffled enough.

Possibly unfree Image:RogerAvaryPENSIF250x.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RogerAvaryPENSIF250x.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  00:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RoAPlushieFinal.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RoAPlushieFinal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  00:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)