User talk:FCBM

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, FCBM. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place help me on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Molecule Extraction (talk) 08:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

June 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on PewDiePie; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~Swarm~  {sting} 06:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Looking at the edits you were making, you're so completely in the wrong that you're lucky you're not blocked. You claim that the article is about his Youtube channel, which started in 2010. However, if you read the article, the very first sentence says: Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg ... better known online as PewDiePie, is a Swedish YouTuber... So, it's about the person, who, according to the article, first became active on Youtube in 2006. It is not the Youtube account itself. I'm sure this is an honest mistake, but please be more careful in the future, and never edit war. If you get reverted, take it to the talk page. ~Swarm~  {sting} 06:57, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

~Swarm~ Woah, wait a minute, the channel “pewdiepie” started in 2010, but Felix started his youtube career in 2006 with the channel named “pewdie”. This article talks about his current channel, not the old one, so the pewdiepe YT info must be shown 2010 not 2006, and if you want to show that, you have to put on the “Youtuber” occupation, not the channel info.FCBM (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ~Swarm~ Everything I did has a reason on it, if I didn’t know about that, I wouldn’t have touched that in the first place. Ok. And don’t mistakenly believe that PDP started in 2006, it’s his YT career.FCBM (talk) 07:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Please listen to me. I'm not trying to be harsh, but you are wrong. Per the article text itself, it is about "Felix Kjellberg, better known online as PewDiePie". It is about the person named Felix Kjellberg. That's the purpose of the bold text in the first sentence. The article title is PewDiePie because that is Felix Kjellberg's common name, not because it is only supposed to be about his Youtube account. The article contains information on his "Early years" starting with the creation of his first account in 2006. It also includes sections on the person's "Appearances in other media", "Philanthropy", "Other ventures", "Personal life", "Filmography", "Gameography", "Discography", "Awards", "Publications", all of which include information about the person, rather than the Youtube channel itself. Also, the article is categorized as a biography about a person, rather than a media format. This sort of confusion can't be happening. You are required to have the basic competence to identify the article's subject, and to differentiate between a person and a thing, such as a Youtuber and their account. I'm not trying to be mean, but it's serious. You need to tell me that you are capable of understanding the difference. ~Swarm~  {sting} 07:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I will help you if you're confused or have questions. But you have to actually understand this. This is a very basic part of editing here. ~Swarm~  {sting} 07:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ~Swarm~  I know that ok. But the part we are talking about is PEWDIEPIE YT information and it created in 2010 not 2006. If you want to make it clearer, you have to make another YT info about his first channel “Pewdie” and then you can put 2006 in “Years active” or you can put it in his occupation. Ppl can mistakenly understand that PDP channel created in 2006, not his YT career, while in fact it’s 2010.FCBM (talk) 07:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * No, the infobox is about the same thing as the article. It contains biographical information about the person. "Active" refers to the artist. Same on every article. Not just their current platform. ~Swarm~  {sting} 07:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ~Swarm~ but why is it changed recently while since the edit 893382084 before that, it showed 2010? If you want to make it clear, you have to put note into it. If not, people will persume that PDP channel started in 2006, not 2010. Of course it’s about biographical information and you have to type everything the person has in their lifetime with the reliable sources, but this is only one channel and that part is specifically for that channel only. If you want to show the whole, why don’t you add the number of subs and views “Pewdie” has to PDP channel info huh? FCBM (talk) 08:25, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that you don't have the competence to understand what I am saying. I am sorry, but an extremely basic level of understanding is all that I am looking for, and I am not seeing it. Therefore, I have no choice but to block your account, per WP:CIR. ~Swarm~  {sting} 10:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ~Swarm~ so now you change the subject by blocking me. How coward you are. You have the power in your hand and this is what administrator look like? Did I vandalise anything to be like this? If you can't handle the truth then fine but do not stop the conversation by blocking someone and said that it's done. I've waited a long time for you to respond and this is what you gave me? Check yourself again. You don't deserve this title.FCBM (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ~Swarm~ and also unblock me, alright. I hate to create enemies in this place. I've had enough with those on viwiki and I don't want it to repeat in this place. OK! FCBM (talk) 11:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ~Swarm~ And another thing, instead of blocking me like that, maybe we should open an anonymous vote and then we can solve this problem. Who win who lose I don't care, when the results are in, we'll not talk about this again. Why don't you think that in the first place, instead you just block me like that huh?FCBM (talk) 11:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 02:42, 19 June 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * And with that, I have revoked your talk page access. ~Swarm~  {sting} 11:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)