User talk:FDC 2/sandbox

Article Review
Sorry for the Delay

After reading your lead I feel that you summarized the information well, your lead tells me what is in the article in the most minimal way possible. Although I believe you could use a lead titled "life" or something of the sort because when reading the article it goes into her life but that is not addressed in the leads. The article is structured well, it is easy to understand and follow. While reading it is simple to figure out which section is which. The article is written in a third person perspective and doesn't take any sides, it simply states information as it should. Although when it comes to sources there seems to be very few, while reading the information which is presented seems credible but there is not any citations backing this information making the article in itself not credible. Overall I would say that the article is written wonderfully, all it needs is some sources.

Kkmainiac (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC) PS if you don't mind check out my sandbox and give my article a review.