User talk:FEBCwiki2016

June 2016
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you because of the following reasons:
 * Your username implies a shared use.
 * Some of your edits can be seen as promoting the FEBC's viewpoints, as in the case of this edit and this one.
 * In one edit you wrote that the edits were requested by the "current principal of FEBC to more accurately represent its position". This does help clarify that you're here to edit on behalf of the organization (part of the WP:COI requirements) however I must warn you that all edits must be written within Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and your edits to Verbal Plenary Preservation look to be non-neutral, especially as you use language like "corrupted and rejected". You cannot definitively state that something is corrupt and all in all, the main gist of Wikipedia is to briefly summarize things rather than go into a huge amount of detail. The basic gist is that only an overview is needed. I would also be remiss if I didn't say that the page does not have to read exactly as the current principal dictates. You can suggest things on their behalf, but it does not have to read exactly as you wrote things.
 * I also would like to ask that you refrain from editing on contentious topics that involve the school, as there's a very real worry that you may not be able to edit in a neutral fashion since you are a representative for the church.
 * You may be unblocked, but you'd have to do the following:
 * Select a username that reflects on you as an individual.
 * Do not make any direct edits about the organization - instead suggest edits on the talk pages.
 * Disclose any conflict of interest.
 * If you can do this (although others may also have requirements) you might be unblocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)