User talk:FEditIldi

AfC notification: Draft:Lundahl & Seitl has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lundahl & Seitl. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, FEditIldi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Yamla,
 * Thank you for sending the information.
 * Best,
 * FEditIldi 2001:1BA8:1316:F200:888A:D593:D760:C1A5 (talk) 20:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lundahl & Seitl (April 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lundahl & Seitl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lundahl_%26_Seitl Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Devonian_Wombat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lundahl_%26_Seitl reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Devonian Wombat,
 * Thank you for reviewing the article. I will try my best to rewrite and change the tone to be more neutral etc. In some cases I see what that mean in this context. However, I have a hard time to grasp what do you mean that the article should have a range of independent, reliable, published sources. (I have a master degree in Art History, so I used to write texts with referencing and using reliable sources. And I have read several Wikipedia guidelines before writing the article). Would it be possible for you please to provide one example from the one I have used in the draft article which does not meet the criteria of being independent, reliable, published sources. It would be an extremely huge help, cause I honestly though that the ones which have been used would be acceptable.
 * Thank you in advance.
 * Best, FEditIldi FEditIldi (talk) 14:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lundahl & Seitl (May 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carpimaps was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lundahl & Seitl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Lundahl_%26_Seitl Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carpimaps&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lundahl_%26_Seitl reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carpimaps talk to me! 10:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * You are really close! The subject seems notable, there are just some major issues that would prevent it from being published to the public. Carpimaps talk to me! 10:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * Thank you so much for reviewing the draft page and also for your comment. Happy to hear that the subject is notable, sounds great. I would like to ask, can you please mention one other example of the major issues that are blocking the article's way of being published? It is a little challenging for me to understand what exactly needs to be changed, thus it would be a great assistance if you can provide some specifics, if it is possible. If so, thank you so much in advance for your time.
 * Best,
 * FEditIldi 2001:1BA8:1316:DB00:2420:AE12:32D7:92B0 (talk) 16:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lundahl & Seitl has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lundahl & Seitl. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lundahl & Seitl has been accepted
 Lundahl & Seitl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Lundahl_%26_Seitl help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! S0091 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)