User talk:FFFlyer

Welcome!

 * }

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Firefly (airline) has been reverted. Your edit here to Firefly (airline) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://flyfireflyz.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Firefly
Hi, Please stop posting on the firefly page about the facebook group. You do not have any credible soruces to back this up. Please note that a blog and facebook itself does not count as a credible source. Please do not post this again until you have a good source. --JetBlast (talk) 22:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Firefly (airline). Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. 68.113.120.216 (talk) 03:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Again, please stop adding Facebook as a source to the page. Social networking websites and other personal blogs are not considered reliable and valid source. If you can find a valid source other than Facebook that backs up this information, then you can readd it. Snoozlepet (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Firefly (airline). Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Luna Santin  (talk) 05:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. There are several problems with your editing. You have, as mentioned above, been edit warring. You have repeatedly added statements to an article using unreliable sources (Wordpress, Facebook, YouTube) despite the fact that editors have pointed out that doing so is unacceptable. You appear to be attempting to use Wikipedia to promote a cause, as part of a campaign, which is not the purpose of Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)