User talk:FFlorence1992

October 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Alen Hadzic, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello.
 * Did you write this Wikepedia on Hadzic in its entirety? The ranking was already C-for content credibility, so I wonder what authority you have to remove the edits? The article has some relevant citations but is peppered with subjective, hear-say that shows malice and some elements of the writer having some personal interest in it being read a certain way.
 * I will re-read it carefully over the course of this week for accuracy, as well as all the prior edits. Thank you. FF FFlorence1992 (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Alen Hadzic) for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

OK, I semi-protected the article, but your presence there is not conducive. First of all, no, Materialscientist did not write the article; that's not what he does. Also, I see where you're going with this, but I'm not letting you bring that in to the article anymore: you can discuss specific things on the article talk page. Finally, please read through WP:COI and if you have a conflict of interest, please act accordingly. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Nothing in the article that was true or pertinent was removed. It is, however, sprinkled with inflammatory language and words, such as "rape" that are not true. Also citing sources that are unreliable. I will request for the page to be removed. FFlorence1992 (talk) 01:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * and thank you for the links to Wiki rules. I'm new to this and will make sure I comply moving on. FFlorence1992 (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 10:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)