User talk:FIRS7

May 2013
Hello, I'm Qwyrxian. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions to Antony Garrett Lisi have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:28, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You did the same thing on Eric Weinstein. In answer to your "question" on Lisi, actually, every scientist, either "success" or "failure", should have a Wikipedia article if they have received significant coverage in the press, or if their scientific ideas are considered of significant merit in their scientific field. If you don't like our policies, then go find a blog to rant and rave on. This is not the place for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * So if I understand well, it is enough to have some friends in the medias who promote you in order to have a wikipedia page? This policy is retarded, considering it allows crackpot to have a wikipedia page when some well known successful scientists with universal recognition don't. If you support such policy, I guess it is more than obvious that you're a retard who doesn't understand anything about science and the way it works.


 * "Bad" policies are made to be changed, and certainly people who supports them for their own fame and recognition are also made to be changed. You know what I mean by changed? ;} FIRS7
 * In response to your last question, no I don't know. In response to the stuff on Lisi...how would you suggest we judge notability? How would you suggest that we distinguish between "people who have received media attention but did not deserve it" and "people who received media attention and did deserve it"? As a side note, most scientists don't have to receive media attention; we have a special set of tests for professors, found at WP:PROF. Someone can qualify for a WP article under either the general or specific categories. Note that having a WP article does not mean that one is scientifically correct; it merely means that one was "noticed" in reliable sources. We have all sorts of articles on false scientific theories, on fictional constructs, on perpetrators of hoaxes, on the hoaxes themselves, etc. Of course, you are welcome to propose alterations to our notability policy, since rules on Wikipedia are decided by consensus. WP:N is a pretty longstanding, widely accepted policy, but if you present cogent arguments, perhaps some modification would be accepted.
 * Finally, with respect to your comments to me, you should know that WP:NPA states that we do not allow personal attacks; one of our core pillars, in fact, is that we must be WP:CIVIL to one another. If all you want to do is insult people, you should probably find another website. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)