User talk:FIsaac.M/Dub poetry/Aaranda13 Peer Review

Aaranda13 (talk) 20:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC) Whose work are you reviewing? I am reviewing FIsaac.M and Samantha_Korenek work. Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dub_poetry

A section in the article that discusses the Political nature of Dub poetry but there is no mention of this in the lead. Perhaps one sentence can be added to the lead that makes note of its political influence. The introductory sentence successfully identifies the definition of Dub poetry and lists the cities later mentioned in the article. The lead briefly mentions the the cities to later be visited but does not discuss other components of the article. The lead elaborates on the nature of Dub poetry but does not revisit this topic later. Perhaps it would be better suited for this description to have its own section. The lead contains a lot of detail over the form of Dub poetry but it paints a clear picture of what it is.

All of the sections add relevant information to the topic. There is information that has been added that references events and musicians from the last 10 years. I would suggest creating a section that specifically describes the origin of Dub poetry in the Caribbean.

There are no arguments or bias detectable in the article. All information is presented in a neutral way. The section on Political nature is very brief and there is quite a bit of information on the Canadian and English relations to Dub poetry. There are no arguments made in the article.

Because of the topic, there is a mix of scholarly and mainstream periodicals referenced in the article. There is a generous amount of sources listed despite the article being on the shorter side. The majority of the sources have been published within the last 10 years. The links are functioning.

The article contains plain language that is accessible to the reader. There are very minimal grammar issues. The article is broken into topics that are of high importance in reference to Dub poetry.

There are no images.

The added information is relevant to the topic but there are sections that could be lengthened. It describes the performance aspect of Dub poetry well and provides a generous list of artists. Again, I think the origin should be expanded on and the Political nature section needs more information.