User talk:FLS1946

James Greenleaf
I understand why you made the changes to James Greenleaf that you did. The problem is that you seem to have knowledge which is in direct contradiction of published information. But Wikipedia has rules against such original research. I am taking in good faith that your edits were intended to be truthful, but Wikipedia isn't about truth, but about what's verifiable. I see that you also attempted to add a source to the bibliography. This source was really incomplete; moreover, when I tried to find this source in Google Books or using a Google search, I could not find it. This violates Wikipedia's rules on using verifiable sources. I strongly urge you to read the Wiki guidlines at WP:CITE and WP:VERIFIABLE, and follow what they say. If there is a published, neutral, reliable source which conflicts with the existing citation, there is a way to deal with that which does not make editors choose which sources is right and which is wrong. I hope you can find that published, reliable source, re-add the information, and improve the article. - Tim1965 (talk) 20:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)