User talk:FMGCCID

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Beyton
The article as it is now is balanced. The sources provided are good quality, neutral sources - YouTube, self published sources and the like are not suitable. The article respects the balance of the sources it uses - your edits are pushing a specific point of view and are not balanced. This is not acceptable in Wikipedia. You would be well advised to ensure that the linkage of both accounts is obvious, public knowledge as well - I suggest a user page. You also need to learn the basics of how talk pages work and how to sign your comments. It saved a hell of a lot of confusion. I would very strongly suggest that you read up about WP:NPOV before you do anything else. And then stop and think about why Wikipedia is so useful and the sorts of qualities that good Wikipedia articles have.

It might also be useful to read WP:UKVILLAGES. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Blue Square Thing
You have now made the article bias. We can just state in a sentence what happened and not interject all the info you have added with the geese. This is how it was before? Every time you have an issue I correct the sources and add new ones to satisfy. I am not using Beyton Village per your request. I am not trying to hide this. Now my name isn't linkable to any group. All you do is delete everything I add while I leave what you put and add to it with sources. You said Avian TB can't be added because there is no source. Now there is the Mintues from a meeting with Avian TB but you still delete the whole section.

July 2016
Hello, I'm Blue Square Thing. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Beyton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Please take your opinions to the talk page and, if you're unhappy there, to the relevant wiki project where there is clear guidance one titles for sections. '' Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

I am asking you to do the same. its 2 sentences. I don't know why you are changing it. This is open website that is for information.


 * Use the article talk page then to try to come to a consensus. You are calling out an individual who could easily be identified. I think this needs to go to some other forum anyway - you're not listening, not signing posts, not reading the damned MOS and wiki project guidelines and generally being massively disruptive. Grow up and actually read some other articles and some of the ways we do things. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)