User talk:FNMF

Archive1

Please note: comments left on this page may be archived or deleted.

regarding format, tos, and youtube/internet celebrities
hey FNMF, thanks alot it was rather confusing. do you use wikipedia. i had question for you articles regarding "internet celebrities". i find it unethical and confusing that all these "youtube" vloggers are creating articles on wikipedia to help propagate "their careers or so-called success". it's pretty disturbing. any thoughts or advice ? am i looking into this too much Sexyorger


 * oh ok great thanks againSexyorge

Factory farming RfM
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests_for_mediation/factory_farming, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. Jav43 17:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

BLP and Aiken
Thanks for deleting those passages in the Aiken entry. Thirteen archived talk pages and a failed cabal mediation attest to the degree of controversy over this material, and I will not be surprised if there are those who insist that the media & controversies section is now incomplete, especially after Ken did away with that whole segment. Things have changed at Wikipedia since that section was originally written, especially when it comes to BLP, but I'll be really surprised if this stands without argument. Note for example this August 2006 edit/edit comment on the Aiken page by an editor who edited the JP entry as recently as a few days ago. I hope you will be willing to support the editors if a debate on Talk:Clay_Aiken should arise. A comment from you on Talk:Clay_Aiken explaining your edits would be a helpful proactive move. Thank you. -Jmh123 22:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm bringing this out of your archive as it has become relevant again, but deleted irrelevant comments. Today the regular editors are being asked to defend and explain your deletions.  I hope you will come to the Aiken talk page and do so.  The relevant discussion begins here  and continues here .  Thanks.  By the way, the article has been completely rewritten, and all controversies incorporated into the text, rather than placing them in a separate section.  -Jmh123 00:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Melbourne Meetup
Hello! The Melburnians are having another meet-up! Please consult this page if you are interested to participate in the discussion! Thanks! Phgao 03:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Bad ideas
Yeah, I think I concur with you there. And that is why I spoke in private, just because, when I'm typing extemporaneously, trying to brainstorm without censoring my own thoughts, I'm bound to generate some bad ideas. I kinda had a feeling it wasn't a good idea going in, which is why I didn't press forward with it. Let bad ideas rest-- if I were to have acted on that argument (or even discussed it publicly), I don't think it would have persuaded the arbs anyway, and so it would have basically been pointless.

And the case soon to be over now anyway, so it's a moot issue. --Alecmconroy (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello FNMF! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Robert Bierman -

Melbourne meetup this Saturday
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)