User talk:FNO1

Lagan Viaduct
Please add your sources. At the moment, it is at risk of being tagged for deletion. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Lagan Viaduct) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Lagan Viaduct

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This has been tagged as an orphaned page and needs additional/better references."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Crawfordsburn Viaduct
Hello,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Crawfordsburn Viaduct should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Crawfordsburn Viaduct.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm a softie, & dislike nominating articles by newish editors, but I really can't see why this deserves an article. I don't know whether you interest is local or railways, but what I would suggest ius creating an article on the railway company.TheLongTone (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah. Looks like bridges &c are your thing? I like a nice bridge myself.TheLongTone (talk) 16:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Whilst I appreciate that it's not the longest article in the world, I don't understand why it should be deleted? Admittedly I know very little about the running of Wikipedia but surely as long as the article is factually correct and cited it should be okay? An article for the railway company already exists but I felt that, as it was the only major engineering structure on the company's network it justified a page of its own. As you have picked up on, my interest lies in local history, built heritage and Irish railways. I've seen articles for much smaller, less significant bridges and they aren't under threat of deletion. 18:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, the deletion discussion looks heading for a keep. I didn't realises there was an article on the company (thought it strange there wasn't; I did try to link it but the link was red. So I assumed.... . The fact that there are other articles areound is not a good one; see [{WP:OTHERSTUFF]].TheLongTone (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Newport railway station (Northern Ireland) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Newport railway station (Northern Ireland), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Newport railway station (Northern Ireland)


Hello. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Newport railway station (Northern Ireland).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)